Skip to comments.
CA: Both sides mull a future without Davis
Bakersfield Californian ^
| 7/12/03
| Robert Price
Posted on 07/12/2003 9:26:32 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: SierraWasp
Hey SierraWasp
Do you note that the folks that say just leave Davis in there to let the Dems get the blame dont LIVE in California....(gee no skin off there nose)
In seem like the national Republicans and party wrote off California a while back.
And now just wants us yahoo out here to sit back and not rock the national boat (that why it seems we get sold out on immigration and other issues lately)
Its also seem to me why we have such a terrible state Republican party ....the national Republican party has put a lot of folks in power in California to do just that ....dont rock the boat
note: the state party did NOT back the recall ..
also note: if the national Republican party had really BACKED Simons instead of pouting because us California locals didnt accept the national party anointing of RINO Rordin we would not be here
Well folks in my opinion as a native Californian, this is pure, fed up, grassroots California rebellion time and if you dont live here ...well thank you very much but......well take it from here
To: everyone
How about the last thing that Dem said:
"A vote for Dean is a vote for the right wing, but then again that like that stuff around here".
22
posted on
07/12/2003 10:48:46 AM PDT
by
Paul8148
To: NormsRevenge
This article repeats a lie that Professor Susan Estrich of California croaked on Fox News a few days ago. If Davis resigns, it does NOT mean the recall is derailed. California law clearly provides that if the target of a recall resigns "after the recall petition has been filed," that person is replaced only "until the election is held." And this recall petition has not only been filed, it has been completed. Since Davis intends to donate his ego to Harvard Medical School, he will never resign. However, if he did, Lt.-Gov. Bustamante will take over only until the recall election is held. In that instance, the only question decided in that election will be who replaces Davis for the balance of his current term.
The writer of this story is either incompetent or dishonest, not to know that California law provides for this possibility in plain English. Incompetent or dishonest -- sort of defines more than half of the American press, doesn't it?
Congressman Billybob
Latest article, now up FR, "Fear and Loathing in the Supreme Court."
23
posted on
07/12/2003 11:10:37 AM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
To: Congressman Billybob
Thanks for this most pertinent info.
24
posted on
07/12/2003 11:12:45 AM PDT
by
Cedric
To: Teacher317
You appear to be forgetting that the hallmark of the American left is that they
cannot win in even a reasonably fair democratic process. This is, of course, why their only long-term agenda successes have come from the judiciary, i.e. from arbitrary decisions by one or a handful of their toadies. So what if the lefties use the recall process -- California's is more poorly designed than most, in that it does not provide for a majority or specific high plurality for the successor candidate -- but that doesn't invalidate the notion of recall itself. If they think they could get 50%+1 to kick out (insert your favourite politico here), let 'em try. They can't, of course.
More recalls, not fewer, are required, and nationwide. The filth (of either party, thank you) who lie their way into office have little or no fear of the wrath of the electorate, and it's high time they acquired some...or a lot.
25
posted on
07/12/2003 11:14:20 AM PDT
by
SAJ
To: Congressman Billybob
Thanks!
The sad thing is the media continues to say the opposite re: filing vs certification and misleads and lies to the public.
But, We should expect nothing less than that from a sad sackful of losers amd moral reprobates now, should we?
26
posted on
07/12/2003 11:15:30 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Support FRee Republic ..... http://www.DRAFTTOM.com ..... Semper Fi)
To: NormsRevenge; *calgov2002; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; snopercod; Grampa Dave; ...
27
posted on
07/12/2003 11:27:06 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
To: Teacher317
Fricking BS!!
The man ran up a $38 BILLION deficit!
Stay out of our business, lot of people are hurting out here because of these Socialists!
28
posted on
07/12/2003 11:29:16 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
To: SierraWasp
Nicely said!
29
posted on
07/12/2003 11:35:45 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
To: elbucko
Change may be painful, but not as painful as the status quo.Absolutely right!
30
posted on
07/12/2003 11:38:45 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
To: SierraWasp
Thank you very much.
31
posted on
07/12/2003 11:53:27 AM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Give to Free Republic before we fall into the ocean!)
To: elbucko; SierraWasp
I believe it's going to shake the whole nation. This is NOT a small thing happening out here.
32
posted on
07/12/2003 11:55:15 AM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Give to Free Republic before we fall into the ocean!)
To: NormsRevenge
"If people realized how much this recall is going to cost California taxpayers, they'd scream," Moore said. "It doesn't make sense." Dear Mr Moore,
Your state is bleeding at the rate of $1 billion (with a B) a month with Davis in there. The recall, by your party's own admission, is $30 million TOTAL!!
Doesn't it make sense to spend a little to save a lot?
Hopefully the recall will but a clamp on the bills coming out of the Dems in Sacramento. Today Davis, Tomorrow Perata, Lockyer, Kuehl, etc.
33
posted on
07/12/2003 12:23:01 PM PDT
by
hattend
To: Teacher317
If it succeeds, the Lefties will use this tactic when it is not warranted. Well, that's how California's constitution was set up.
If they can get the signatures, they have the right. It'll make them look petty.
There is no downside to this recall effort.
34
posted on
07/12/2003 12:25:42 PM PDT
by
hattend
To: NormsRevenge
And it would insert a guy who would be far more palatable -- particularly among valley Latinos -- than the man he'd be replacing, let alone some of the likely recall-ballot options.Well, since the author is looking at the recall election from a racist point of view, I'll go on record as saying that I want Davis' replacement to be someone who is more palatable to the white residents of California.
35
posted on
07/12/2003 12:30:48 PM PDT
by
judgeandjury
(The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state.)
To: Teacher317
If it succeeds, the Lefties will use this tactic when it is not warranted.Most voters will use common sense when contemplating whether or not to recall a governor.
36
posted on
07/12/2003 12:34:10 PM PDT
by
judgeandjury
(The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state.)
To: gcruse
"...cut spending and reduce services mightily ..
I am a California Voter. I would support any candidate that would cut spending and reduce services mightily...
To: CIB-173RDABN
Unfortunately, you are heavily outnumbered by the welfare statists. Anyone rolling back social services will be doomed.
Might as well let it be a democrat, because whoever does it, the opposition party will be in power immediately thereafter.
38
posted on
07/12/2003 12:42:34 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
To: judgeandjury
It's gone way beyond race in this State. It's the commie agenda that's crept-in. Hell, the so-called minorities are scrapping amongst themselves, because they can't trust one another to provide "equality" for "all" of the races. And, and many of the whites have been so pacified, that they don't even know that they're gettin' screwed! The communists have done their jobs well in California. The level of education in this State is abominable. It's like herding sheep!
To: gcruse
Other than public employees - especially union members - I'm not sure how many people gain from the nanny state as we have it.
I'm frankly embarassed at the quality of government services in this state. Every other state I've been to (Florida, Texas, Arizona, Nevada, etc) has appeared to have a more together government with better services, and yet taxes and property values in all those states are much lower.
If the new governor simply points out that he's cutting back on services that were too lousy to use anyway, he might get a lot more points than you are thinking.
Remember, Gray Davis, unbelievable as this may seem now, ran as a fiscal conservative!
D
40
posted on
07/12/2003 1:02:48 PM PDT
by
daviddennis
(Visit amazing.com for protest accounts, video & more!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson