While it might be a worthwhile endeavor to make all judges subject to the approval of the electorate, I think that concealed carry could sail through the legislative process if we (Johnson County especially) didn't keep sending RINO (or Democratic) governors to Topeka to veto the legislation.
We don't like it when liberal, Demorat judges make law from the bench. We shouldn't do the same, even if we approve the outcome. Unconstitutional is unconstitutional.
But I like your thinking.
I didn't mean to imply that I wanted to elect judges just so we could ram our agenda down everyone's throats. What I meant by "conservative" is that they would interpret the law instead of making it up out of thin air to suit their agenda.
And now that I think about it, CCW is a legislative matter, not judicial. So...don't mind me.
Thanks for your thoughts!