To: Rodney King
Whatever. Personally I would like to see it without subtitles. We'll see.
8 posted on
07/12/2003 4:10:11 AM PDT by
wolficatZ
To: wolficatZ
I don't really need subtitles, either. After a lifetime in Catholic church praying during the Way of the Cross, I know the words in my heart.
But since Gibson hopes to attract a wider audience, he's the director, let him decide.
Maybe someday we can watch the director's cut on DVD.
Looking forward to seeing this movie very much, subtitles or no.
10 posted on
07/12/2003 4:24:18 AM PDT by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
To: wolficatZ
Whatever. Personally I would like to see it without subtitles. We'll see. I will see it without subititles also, but remember, hopefully the point of the movie is not just to please those of us who already love the Lord. Hopefully, 100 million non-Christians around the world will see the movie and learn to love Christ. It is those people who are most important, and it is for them that their ought to be subtitles as they don't know and understand what really happened.
11 posted on
07/12/2003 4:27:00 AM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: wolficatZ
I would like to see it both ways.
Heck, show it in subtitles in some theaters and not in others.
But, it probably would be more practical to have no subtitles in the movie version, but add them for the dvd.
47 posted on
07/14/2003 8:46:11 PM PDT by
rwfromkansas
("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
To: wolficatZ
they should produce two versions, one with subtitles, one without.
118 posted on
08/18/2003 3:54:44 PM PDT by
FrdmLvr
("No more is the image of America one of strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson