Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK
New York Post ^ | 7/12/03 | BRIAN BLOMQUIST

Posted on 07/12/2003 2:17:32 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:15:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

July 12, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - A federal judge helping to rebuild Iraq's judicial system says he's come up with an intriguing document linking Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden.

Federal appellate Judge Gilbert Merritt, who is currently in Iraq, said an Iraqi lawyer brought him documents that included the name of an Iraqi officer in that country's embassy in Pakistan who was described as "responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group."


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; osama; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: MeeknMing
Thanks for the heads up!
21 posted on 07/12/2003 5:55:34 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

22 posted on 07/12/2003 6:06:37 AM PDT by StriperSniper (Frogs are for gigging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"It seems to me to be strong proof that the two were in contact and conspiring to perform terrorist acts," Merritt, a Democrat and longtime family friend of Al Gore

The fact that he's a Democrat and would still say this means the evidence must be pretty damn strong in his mind.

23 posted on 07/12/2003 6:14:29 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; #1CTYankee; .303 Brit; Agamemnon; AGBRUHN; always vigilant; Anarchist; Andonius_99; ...
major bump for more proof!
24 posted on 07/12/2003 6:20:47 AM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Have the lame-stream media picked this story up yet or are they still sniffing a yellow-cake scandal from Niger?
25 posted on 07/12/2003 6:21:11 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; rwfromkansas; backhoe
FYI
26 posted on 07/12/2003 6:27:48 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The truth will out but in the interim the DemocRats are having a nervous breakdown.
27 posted on 07/12/2003 6:29:00 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Will wonders never cease!
28 posted on 07/12/2003 6:42:38 AM PDT by rintense (Freedom is contagious, and everyone wants to catch it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
*BUMP*!
29 posted on 07/12/2003 7:01:14 AM PDT by ex-Texan (My tag line is broken !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Skeptical but hopeful... The Gore link is important in understanding his background and motive for the story, but he may be playing a game.

The judge is on 90-day assignment in Iraq and his time is about up, so he has to come up with something to say.

Local Judge Chosen to Help Rebuild Iraqi Justice System

A judge from Cincinnati is one of 13 legal experts chosen by the Justice Department to help rebuild Iraq's judicial system.

Judge Gilbert Merritt is a senior judge on the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati.

Merritt will go to Fort Bliss, Texas, Sunday for orientation before flying to Baghdad for the 90 day assignment.


30 posted on 07/12/2003 7:01:17 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough (What if you had to choose between breathing or FReeping?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Shouldnt this be a mainstream story? Why dont any of the networks have it?
31 posted on 07/12/2003 7:01:38 AM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Shouldnt this be a mainstream story? Why dont any of the networks have it? - Because now it's time to move on and put all of this behind us!
32 posted on 07/12/2003 7:13:41 AM PDT by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Surely now this will make the headlines in all the papers and newscasts across the country and the president will be vindicated. < /sarcasm >
33 posted on 07/12/2003 7:32:01 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump
34 posted on 07/12/2003 7:32:49 AM PDT by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
"It seems to me to be strong proof that the two were in contact and conspiring to perform terrorist acts," Merritt, a Democrat and longtime family friend of Al Gore, wrote in a dispatch for The Tennesseean newspaper - charges similar to those previously reported by The Weekly Standard.

It'll be interesting to see how the dems spin this one. Any guesses?

35 posted on 07/12/2003 7:33:05 AM PDT by b4its2late (FOOTBALL REFEREES - Sure, it's tough to play with us, but there's no game without us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
From the Daily Standard:
Stephen F. Hayes

[snip]

The story Judge Merritt relates is similar to an account reported in The Weekly Standard last May. Splashed across the front page of the November 16, 2002, edition of Uday Hussein's Babil newspaper were two "honor" lists, one of which included Aswod (spelled "Aswad") and identified him as the "official in charge of regime's contacts with Osama bin Laden's group and currently the regime's representative in Pakistan."

I stumbled upon this passage doing research for another piece. So I brought the article to the attention of administration officials, who hadn't yet seen it, and asked for comment. Intelligence analysts were perplexed, particularly because of a passage in the text preceding the list. It read: "We publish this list of great men for the sons of our great people to see." And below that: "This is a list of the henchmen of the regime. Our hands will reach them sooner or later. Woe unto them. A list of the leaders of Saddam's regime, as well as their present and previous posts."

The second description was clearly hostile in tone--"henchmen of the regime" and "woe unto them." Analysts weren't sure what to make of the introduction or the list, but suggested Uday Hussein may have simply republished a list of "henchmen" distributed by an Iraqi opposition group without realizing he was publicly linking his father to Osama bin Laden.

That still seems like the most plausible explanation to me. (Although Judge Merritt's report that the front page of the four-page newspaper carried side-by-side photographs of bin Laden and Saddam is interesting.) Still, some intelligence officials believe that Aswad--who publicly raised doubts after September 11 about whether Osama bin Laden is a terrorist--was an important link between Iraq and al Qaeda

. If the newspaper reports are interesting but inconclusive, two other recent reports are more compelling. Jessica Stern, a Harvard professor and Clinton administration national security official, discusses the links in a fascinating and sober analysis of the Al Qaeda threat in the current issue of Foreign Affairs.

Under the subheading, "Friends of Convenience," she writes:

Meanwhile, the Bush administration's claims that al Qaeda was cooperating with the "infidel" (read: secular) Saddam Hussein while he was still in office are now also gaining support, and from a surprising source. Hamid Mir, bin Laden's "official biographer" and an analyst for al Jazeera, spent two weeks filming in Iraq during the war. Unlike most reporters, Mir wandered the country freely and was not embedded with U.S. troops. He reports that he has "personal knowledge" that one of Saddam's intelligence operatives, Farooq Hijazi, tried to contact bin Laden in Afghanistan as early as 1998. At that time, bin Laden was publicly still quite critical of the Iraqi leader, but he had become far more circumspect by November 2001, when Mir interviewed him for the third time.

Hijazi has acknowledged meeting with al Qaeda representatives, perhaps with bin Laden himself, even before the outreach in 1998. According to news reports and interviews with intelligence officials, Hijazi met with al Qaeda leaders in Sudan in 1994.

Former Navy Secretary John Lehman, a member of the congressional commission investigating the September 11 attacks, added to the intrigue this week when he flatly declared, "there is evidence" of Iraq-al Qaeda links. Lehman has access to classified intelligence as a member of the commission, intelligence that has convinced him the links may have been even greater than the public pronouncements of the Bush administration might suggest. "There is no doubt in my mind that [Iraq] trained them in how to prepare and deliver anthrax and to use terror weapons."

36 posted on 07/12/2003 7:33:32 AM PDT by BigWaveBetty (Roll that beautiful bean footage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
It'll be interesting to see how the dems spin this one. Any guesses?

Yes. See my post #18.

37 posted on 07/12/2003 7:47:43 AM PDT by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
O, kattracks. This is b------t. Everyone know the case has not been made regarding Al Qaeda and Iraq having connections. Who cares about the evidence, for God's sakes? We have an election coming up next year, and we don't need any more damn successes for American security. Let's just agree, shall we? There are NO connections between Al Qaeda and Saddam. No matter what. <\sarcasm>
38 posted on 07/12/2003 7:52:11 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
LOL! Love it! :0
39 posted on 07/12/2003 7:53:28 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson