Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Document links Saddam, bin Laden
The Tennessean ^ | 07/11/03 | GILBERT S. MERRITT

Posted on 07/11/2003 10:31:01 AM PDT by FreeVietnam

Edited on 05/07/2004 9:20:26 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Through an unusual set of circumstances, I have been given documentary evidence of the names and positions of the 600 closest people in Iraq to Saddam Hussein, as well as his ongoing relationship with Osama bin Laden. I am looking at the document as I write this story from my hotel room overlooking the Tigris River in Baghdad. One of the lawyers with whom I have been working for the past five weeks had come to me and asked me whether a list of the 600 people closest to Saddam Hussein would be of any value now to the Americans. I said, yes, of course. He said that the list contained not only the names of the 55 ''deck of cards'' players who have already been revealed, but also 550 others. When I began questioning him about the list, how he obtained it and what else it showed, he asked would it be of interest to the Americans to know that Saddam had an ongoing relationship with Osama bin Laden. I said yes, the Americans have, so far as I am aware, have never been able to prove that relationship, but the president and others have said that they believe it exists. He said, ''Well, judge, there is no doubt it exists, and I will bring you the proof tomorrow.'' So today he brought me the proof, and there is no doubt in my mind that he is right. The document shows that an Iraqi intelligence officer, Abid Al-Karim Muhamed Aswod, assigned to the Iraq embassy in Pakistan, is ''responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group.'' The document shows that it was written over the signature of Uday Saddam Hussein, the son of Saddam Hussein. The story of how the document came about is as follows. Saddam gave Uday authority to control all press and media outlets in Iraq. Uday was the publisher of the Babylon Daily Political Newspaper. On the front page of the paper's four-page edition for Nov. 14, 2002, there was a picture of Osama bin Laden speaking, next to which was a picture of Saddam and his ''Revolutionary Council,'' together with stories about Israeli tanks attacking a group of Palestinians. On the back page was a story headlined ''List of Honor.'' In a box below the headline was ''A list of men we publish for the public.'' The lead sentence refers to a list of ''regime persons'' with their names and positions. The list has 600 names and titles in three columns. It contains, for example, the names of the important officials who are members of Saddam's family, such as Uday, and then other high officials, including the 55 American ''deck of cards'' Iraqi officials, some of whom have been apprehended. Halfway down the middle column is written: ''Abid Al-Karim Muhamed Aswod, intelligence officer responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group at the Iraqi embassy in Pakistan.'' (For more about the list, see accompanying article on this page.) The lawyer who brought the newspaper to me, Samir, and another lawyer with whom I have been working, Zuhair, translated the Arabic words and described what had happened in Baghdad the day it was published. Samir bought his paper at a newsstand at around 8 a.m. Within two hours, the Iraqi intelligence officers were going by every newsstand in Baghdad and confiscating the papers. They also went to the home of every person who they were told received a paper that day and confiscated it. The other lawyer, Zuhair, who was the counsel for the Arab League in Baghdad, did not receive delivery of his paper that day. He called his vendor, who told him that there would be no paper that day, a singular occurrence he could not explain. For the next 10 days, the paper was not published at all. Samir's newspaper was not confiscated and he retained it because it contained this interesting ''Honor Roll of 600'' of the people closest to the regime. The only explanation for this strange set of events, according to the Iraqi lawyers, is that Uday, an impulsive and somewhat unbalanced individual, decided to publish this honor roll at a time when the regime was under worldwide verbal attack in the press, especially by us. It would, he thought, make them more loyal and supportive of the regime. His father was furious, knowing that it revealed information about his supporters that should remain secret. For example, at the same time this was published, Saddam was denying that he had any relationship with Osama. Therefore Saddam had all the papers confiscated, and he ordered that publication of the paper be stopped for 10 days. That is the story of the ''Honor Roll of 600,'' and why I believe that President Bush was right when he alleged that Saddam was in cahoots with Osama and was coordinating activities with him. It does not prove that they engaged together in any particular act of terror against the United States. But it seems to me to be strong proof that the two were in contact and conspiring to perform terrorist acts. Up until this time, I have been skeptical about these claims. Now I have changed my mind. There is, however, one big problem remaining: They are both still at large and the combined forces of the free world have been unable to find them. Until we find and capture them, they will remain a threat

(Excerpt) Read more at tennessean.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; binladen; bushdoctrineunfold; saddam; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: AAABEST
Chatroom? It was more like a BUNKER.

LOL! You're definitely right about that. Helluva of time it was. I got a bit wobbly near the end there, thinking we were gonna lose, but you were a soldier and kept faith all the way.

41 posted on 07/11/2003 12:23:56 PM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gabrielle Reilly
Your welcome...actually that originally came from FR..I found it in a search one day and posted it here on one of the threads, I still had the document on file, that is why I had the link handy.
42 posted on 07/11/2003 12:33:12 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AHerald
Also of interest...there were the predictions by an Iraqi with ties to Iraqi intelligence, Naeem Abd Mulhalhal, in Qusay's own newspaper several weeks before the attacks that stated bin Laden would “demolish the Pentagon after he destroys the White House and ”bin Laden would strike America “on the arm that is already hurting.” (referencing a second IRAQI sponsored attack on the World Trade Center). Another reference to New York was “[bin Laden] will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra everytime he hears his songs.” (e.g., “New York, New York”) which identified New York, New York as a target. Mulhalhal also stated, “The wings of a dove and the bullet are all but one and the same in the heart of a believer." which references an airplane attack. [originally from the FindLaw lawsuit cited in a previous post, but also at the link below]

The Arabic language daily newspaper Al-Quds Al-Arabic also cited the cooperation between Iraq, bin Laden and Al December 1998 editorial, which predicted that “President Saddam Hussein, whose country was subjected to a four day air strike, will look for support in taking revenge on the United States and Britain by cooperating with Saudi oppositionist Osama Bin-Laden, whom the United States considers to be the most wanted person in the world.”

Source

Also in 1998, an Arab intelligence officer, who knows Saddam personally, predicted in Newsweek: "Very soon you will be witnessing large-scale terrorist activity run by the Iraqis." The Arab official said these terror operations would be run under "false flags" --spook-speak for front groups--including bin Laden's organization. This was reported by Laurie Mylorie. That and other info can be found here.

How could these people have had foreknowledge without Iraq being involved?

43 posted on 07/11/2003 12:59:07 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Hadn't heard of some of that info before. Thanks for posting it.
44 posted on 07/11/2003 1:03:43 PM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Gabrielle Reilly
IRAQ is the only state known to have purchased and assembled the super gun, a weapon so large it must be constructed in segments. It has a range of several hundred miles.

Read Frederick Forsyth's book "Fist of God". It is a fictional account of this supergun and is a fantastic book.

45 posted on 07/11/2003 1:07:13 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (Dues paying member of the vast right wing conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
>>>>>>>>Read Frederick Forsyth's book "Fist of God". It is a fictional account of this supergun and is a fantastic book. >>>>>>>>

Thanks for the recommendation. I will have to check it out. :)
46 posted on 07/11/2003 1:09:44 PM PDT by Gabrielle Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Yes, but look at who is doing the discounting. They have something to gain (making the President look bad) by discounting it.
47 posted on 07/11/2003 1:56:14 PM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Making the President look bad been going on here,TV,newspapers,radio and other sites.Full court press.
48 posted on 07/11/2003 2:23:35 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Mylorie was just on Fox with John Gibson. Good interview, she says the real scandal is that the CIA is covering up the information being sent to Bush about 9/11 being an Iraq operation. They are covering it up because to admit it, they would have to also admit that the WTC 93 bombing was an Iraqi operation, and nothing was done about it.
49 posted on 07/11/2003 2:27:54 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Some people never give up even when everyone else has thrown in the towel.

What about Iraq's involvement in OKC? TWA-800? Clinton's impeachment, maybe?

The list goes on . . and on . . and on.

50 posted on 07/11/2003 3:40:43 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Thought you'd be interested in this since it relates directly to the subject of this thread. It was posted today on The Weekly Standard's web site:

The Al Qaeda Connection, cont. More reason to suspect that bin Laden and Saddam may have been in league.

51 posted on 07/11/2003 7:36:49 PM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
"What about Iraq's involvement in OKC? "

Well the OKC reporter that has been following the Iraqi connection and naming Iraqi suspects was in fact vindicated in a court of law when sued by one of the Iraqi suspects she was naming.

52 posted on 07/11/2003 7:51:04 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FreeVietnam
Bump for a later read. Thanks.
53 posted on 07/11/2003 7:52:34 PM PDT by Lady In Blue (Bush,Cheney,Rumsfeld,Rice 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Were the Sunday Telegraph reports found to be innaccurate.
54 posted on 07/11/2003 8:00:04 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

?
55 posted on 07/11/2003 8:08:36 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: AHerald
I also noticed that the story made the inside cover of the Boston Herald; and yet it's two weeks old.

Add that to the timing of Tenet taking the fall which is on the cover of the all but the Murdoch tabs, and what you get is a Friday push (recall the Clinton tactics) of what looks to be good news for the administrations case.

I can't figure it out, that is for sure.
56 posted on 07/12/2003 7:39:54 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Which reports?

57 posted on 07/12/2003 7:40:17 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Forget that court in New York. Its a leftie judge who, as far as I can tell, is hoping to find some junk on Saudi connections to Bush.

Jayna Davis, the reporter you speak of, was completely discredited when she got her chance to shine in front of Dan Burton. Burton, who once shot a watermellon in his backyard to challenge the Vince Foster theory, is a friend of stories like this, but he thinks Davis is a charlatan.

58 posted on 07/12/2003 7:46:17 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
"Jayna Davis, the reporter you speak of, was completely discredited when she got her chance to shine in front of Dan Burton...but he thinks Davis is a charlatan. "

What's your source on that? Because I can't find anything more recent than the April 23 court ruling and I can't find anything negative when googling "Dan Burton Jayna Davis".

I suspect that the war kind of put a lot of stuff on hold.

59 posted on 07/12/2003 9:53:53 AM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Here I missed this. Not only did Wolfowitz say there is a connection. But that judge actually awarded damages based on proof presented in his courtroom.

Newsmax Articles?

60 posted on 07/12/2003 10:06:42 AM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson