[A Vast RightWing Conspirator]

Spin coming too late. The WH already agreed that the SOTU claim was not true.

[zook]

No. The WH said there were questions about the evidence. They said the claim shouldn't have been in the SOTU address.

[WarrenC]

Spin coming too late. The WH already agreed that the SOTU claim was not true.

You might want to actually read the article before making a comment that has no relevance whatever to its content.

[kevkrom]

The WH already agreed that the SOTU claim was not true.

Incorrect -- the WH said that the documents in question were false, but did not retract the SOTU claim, nor needed to, as that was not the basis for the president's statement.

[MEG33]

I wonder... which of the Dem candidates would you prefer?

[Grampa Dave]

There you go again! You are worse than the left wing media with your spins/lies/miss quotes!

[Eva]

The Whitehouse may have admitted that the British claim was untrue, but not that the British made the claim, which is what Bush said in the STOU. The Bush bashers are lying again.
When will the Democrats learn that lying doesn't pay big dividends?

[faithincowboys]

Yeah, and that was idiotic. Considering the forgery documents were not all that contributed to the claim, the British stand behind their assertion, and the CIA investigation was done by a Leftist who didn't want to go to war with Iraq and it consisted of "Did he try to get Uranium from you?"

Dude from Niger, "No!" And Wilson was satisfied, well golly gee that settles it then.