To: schaketo
I'm no historian, but I think there were some major differences between the way we conducted our revolution and the way the French conducted theirs.
Just for starters, we avoided the murderous mobs, kangaroo courts, and wholesale executions that were hallmarks of the French affair.
Then we set up an actual government that continues to this day, instead of going through various "emperors" and other despots.
Finally, we've managed to to snatch our own bacon out of the fire when troubles arose - a fairly conspicuous difference from the French model.
Or have I got this all wrong?
36 posted on
07/11/2003 7:04:40 AM PDT by
Redbob
To: Redbob
A savage cartoon from the great English caricaturist, Gillray:
![](http://icg.harvard.edu/~eng150/syllabus/Images/Blow-ups/Gillray.jpg)
41 posted on
07/11/2003 7:07:07 AM PDT by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
To: Redbob
Just for starters, we avoided the murderous mobs,
kangaroo courts, and wholesale executions that were hallmarks of the French affair.
That's probably because, as I have been convinced by
another freeper, ours was a war of independence, not
a revolution. We were not at war with an entrenched
government run by other Americans.
101 posted on
07/11/2003 12:42:30 PM PDT by
gcruse
(There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson