[A Vast RightWing Conspirator]

There may not even be a need for a 'third' party. As 'bi-partisanship' takes over just about all important issues, the Demo-GOP merger may become a fait accompli (did I spell it right?) before long. People may wake up one day and realize that all they have is a 'party of big, socialist government' with 2 names. Very much like Ford Taurus vs. Mercury Sable. A significantly large party of freedom may then emerge naturally.

[Smile-n-Win]

A significantly large party of freedom may then emerge naturally.

Ron Paul could be an excellent leader for that party--if only he understood that "peacenik" libertarianism is not conducive to liberty.

[Skywalk]

So the fact that this same drivel appears in LYNDON LAROUCHE'S magazine, down to the claim that Strauss is their intellectual godfather, does not disturb you and damage the credibility of this article?

Look, most of us on this thread probably agree with RP on domestic issues, with the exception of a few WODies, but foreign policy is where we must part ways. can't you see that you need not support an 18th century style foreign policy, but can still oppose domestic interventionism?

Or should we pretend other countries aren't a threat or wait until biochemicals are released to do something?