To: Smile-n-Win
There's no way Ron Paul came up with this on his own. The dead giveaway is the Leo Strauss item.
How do I know this? Because the other day some loon handed me a Lyndon LaRouche magazine, that said "Children of Satan" on the cover with a picture of Rumsfeld and Bush. Inside it has an entire article on Leo Strauss.
I wonder where the Strauss thing came from, because almost none of the people writing about that link have ever read Strauss. I confess that I haven't either, but from summaries I've read, I don't see the sinister aspect of Strauss' thought, nor was he an overt political scientist/power-gamer. In addition, I am not sure if everyone they slander with the term "neo-con" even knows much about Strauss.
These people are all loons who advance half-truths and outright lies to turn people against their political opponents.
41 posted on
07/11/2003 4:23:20 AM PDT by
Skywalk
To: Skywalk
Not sure but he may have been a professor for one class for Wolfowitz.There's another great leap made in a Canadian columnist.I forget the name of the evil mentor he named.
45 posted on
07/11/2003 4:36:44 AM PDT by
MEG33
To: Skywalk
I am not sure if everyone they slander with the term "neo-con" even knows much about Strauss. Part of the modus operandi of these slanderers is to sound like the "neocons" are a small group of people who know each other and coordinate their actions as they seek world domination. History will put the term "neoconservative" right next to "Illuminati" and "Bilderbergers" and "Elders of Zion"...
It is too bad, really, that a man like Ron Paul could fall for such garbage. The reason for terrorism and the growing government is a lack of moral clarity on the part of conservatives (in the face of a lot of immoral clarity from leftists), not some mysterious conspiracy involving a lot of Jews.
50 posted on
07/11/2003 4:50:56 AM PDT by
Smile-n-Win
(Make money, not trouble!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson