Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smile-n-Win
Speaking of a "neo-conservative philosophy" that Rummy and Cheney allegedly adhere to when neither Rummy nor Cheney (nor anyone really close to the President himself, who is the one that truly calls the shots) has ever been heard calling himself a neo-conservative...

The fact that an individual does not wear a lapel pin indicating his membership in a particular philosophical subset does not mean he is not ideologically part of that subset. Especially true for high profile officals.

....is, as I see it, a symptom of a mistaken approach to foreign policy. The objective is to find the source of the mistake.

You lost me here. Whose mistake and objective do you refer to, Paul's or the neocons?

Regards

J.R.

278 posted on 07/11/2003 7:07:55 PM PDT by NMC EXP (Choose one: [a] party [b] principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: NMC EXP
Whose mistake and objective do you refer to, Paul's or the neocons?

My objective (with posting the thread) and Paul's mistake.

295 posted on 07/12/2003 11:14:40 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win (It is the nature of evil to self-destruct--but the number of good that get killed is up to the good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson