The fact that an individual does not wear a lapel pin indicating his membership in a particular philosophical subset does not mean he is not ideologically part of that subset. Especially true for high profile officals.
....is, as I see it, a symptom of a mistaken approach to foreign policy. The objective is to find the source of the mistake.
You lost me here. Whose mistake and objective do you refer to, Paul's or the neocons?
Regards
J.R.
My objective (with posting the thread) and Paul's mistake.