Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
I don't think so, what happened here is sand, lots and lots of sand.

Well, I wasn't there. So, at the end of the day, I wouldn't pass judgement on those that were. But I've seen 50s shoot with large amounts of grit, sand etc in them. Once that baby gets going it's got inertia on its side.

From my own experience, like I said earlier, these MOS involved here don't know or look after their weapons the same way an infantry soldier would. It seems incomprehensible to me that three different weapons systems failing would be the reason this convoy met the fate it did. I suppose it could happen and I won't rule that out, but I don't see how one could rule out operator level maintenance either.

70 posted on 07/10/2003 5:46:33 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Prodigal Son
Out of my league commenting on weapons maintenance, but I think it's worth pointing out that the 507th (or elements of it) had been on the road for 60 hours (per the W. Post). Maybe they deserve a little less criticism considering the obvious difficulty of proper care of the weapons under those circumstances.
84 posted on 07/10/2003 6:43:24 PM PDT by smalltown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson