[nightdriver]

"It's not in the court's charge to change language that has already been re-defined constitutionally."

I realise that it's like asking for a chunk of the moon, but the Dredd Scott decision can not be rationally adjudicated even from the pre-thirteenth ammendment version of the Constitution.

I rankles that there is no recourse. It can easily lead to thoughts of other means that are definitely illegal.

[LS]

I know what you mean. It is stupid that the court would even have that in its record.