Replies

Good post. Good thoughts.

I would have to agree. I don't want a President representing me that thinks he must lie to conduct his business.

However, one must consider this. The concept he lied is coming from: (the DEMS, the media, and a fake spy)

Who do you believe?

I agree with you. Now the Clinton group (Carvill et al)... they would have already trashed this fake spy to the point that nobody believed a word he said. They would have dug up every single bit of dirt on this guy from the time he went to kindergarden until last Tuesday. And that would be "the" story. The dirt on this guy.

As much as I hate the Clintons, I gotta admit that they knew how to play hardball. You gotta give em that much.

Not everything coming from liberal mouths is a lie (that seems to be a very popular notion around here.) Do I believe that Dems and libs in general are more prone to outright lying? Yes- their record speaks for itself (see Clinton years and this century for examples). But the Dems didn't create a special office of intelligence in the DOD that fed information to Bush while circumventing or bad mouthing CIA and the DOD itself. The Dems haven't hid WMDS is Iraq so they can't be found. The Dems didn't say Iraq was an imminent threat to us and had reconstituted nukes. The Dems didn't make GWII use faked info in the State of the Union address (well some actually did). That the dems exploit these issues or can be shown to be double talking hypocrites on this matter (most supported the war) is really of no importance to me. I don't trust their words or their motives. But I ain't gonna put blinders on either. As it is now- there is no proof of anything other than perhaps bad judgement and over zelous interpretation of dubious intelligence (and that is not even fact yet). But there is more than enough for questions to be asked at least! And this whole discussion is quite theoretical. If we couldn't prosecute Clinton for lying to a Grand Jury so blatantly then do you think Bush could ever be impeached on "lies" that could never in a million years be proved true?