Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
To: arasina
Jim is the last word on this board, I agree. But did Jimrob have this info? Doug didn't even have this info.

I respect JimRob, but i make up my own mind.

Thanks for the insight though. :-)
221 posted on 07/09/2003 6:26:49 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Registered; Doug Thompson
Doug, I think you need to post a scanned copy of the business card at a minimum - or let Registered do it.
222 posted on 07/09/2003 6:28:23 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (670: neighbor of the neighbor of The Beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Perhaps the most productive thing you could do would be to track down what other news services and major stories have originated from this fraudulent person, and out anything else you can find out about him.

A difficult task, I know, but with so many bullcrap stories from the NY Times, et. al. attributed to anonymous sources, seems quite likely that some of these stories could have been false ones planted by this guy. There seems to have been more than one Greg Packer, and several with far more sinister agendas. Why would this guy do this? Perhaps its just an ego boosting con game, but I would certainly like to know if this guy has any connections to the McCauliffe/Mulholland wing of the Democrats.

Would be quite a redemptive story if your research forced the NY Times to retract major stories, or you outed a Democrat disinfo campaign.
223 posted on 07/09/2003 6:28:35 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pegita
Protection from what? I see nothing in this that puts him at legal jeopardy. Do you?

I mean we're not talking about a "Princess Diana was 4 months pregnant before the accident" story...
224 posted on 07/09/2003 6:29:29 PM PDT by Registered (77% of the mentally ill live in poverty, that leaves 23% doing quite well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Registered; MJY1288; habs4ever; harrowup; Dog; deport; Doug Thompson
I applaud you gentlemen for asking the tough questions. I have been gone all day and just read this thread.

I am not impressed with the apology after the story has been picked up by other wires, which I believe was the intent.

I would also, as Registered and others have requested, like proof that this person even existed outside the imagination of Mr. Thompson. To my mind the Wilkinson character is no better than the New York Times "unnamed administration officials" that I have complained about for years.

I do hope that people take two lessons from this episode:

1. Any story that is not accurately sourced must be looked at with scepticism.

2. Free Republic is USED by leftists to advance their agenda. We should be more careful and do more to prevent it from happening.

225 posted on 07/09/2003 6:30:15 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: TWfromTEXAS
I told you this story was BS, read this thread.
226 posted on 07/09/2003 6:31:30 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Just to say I emailed Japan Today with a link to your correction (probably lots of other people did too) and they seem to have taken the original story down.
227 posted on 07/09/2003 6:32:26 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered; habs4ever; Mo1; Miss Marple; RedWhiteBlue; William McKinley; All
I'm gonna send this whole story over to Sean Hannity, he likes getting to the bottom of these things, I will send it over to Bill O'Reilly as well. I suggest everyone here send the original "Bush Lied" article with the un-edited headline, why and how the title was edited, along with the great work William McKinley did by adding links to his post yesterday and the response from Doug Thompson on that thread along with links to tonights thread.

The more people involved in this serious matter, the quicker we ferret out who the telling lies and who is not

228 posted on 07/09/2003 6:32:29 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The truth will et you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Pegita
In house counsel for Capitol Blue, if they have it, should handle this, and his editors and publisher should see his source notes.I hope he satisfies their queries.
229 posted on 07/09/2003 6:33:52 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Registered; habs4ever; Mo1; Howlin; RedWhiteBlue; William McKinley
Maybe we should get a ping list involved in this letter sending to Sean Hannity and whoever else might get this ball rolling
230 posted on 07/09/2003 6:35:38 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The truth will et you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Wow. Just wow.
231 posted on 07/09/2003 6:36:25 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
I taped it. In fact, I have it online and have told Freepers about it, so they can come see who you really are.

just kidding....:)

Glad to see you came to your senses after voting for him once.
232 posted on 07/09/2003 6:36:40 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I sent the urls to Rush 24/7, but the more letters the better the chance of Rush seeing it.
233 posted on 07/09/2003 6:37:59 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: section9
Ping
234 posted on 07/09/2003 6:38:44 PM PDT by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Thanks, habs ... there's a whole lot of explaining to be done ...
235 posted on 07/09/2003 6:38:45 PM PDT by Pegita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Thanks for admitting it.
Intel cant and wont issue a public statement decrying the vast amount of BS that is currently making the rounds.
Suffice it to say, that any real Intel resource who talks to the press has an agenda, normally approved through official channels, more or less.Often more.
Dont feel too stupid.Many reporters are information mushrooms.Kept in the dark and spoon fed manure.
Reporters are predictably and incredibly succeptible to the allure of an "inside" source.
Dont play with the big dogs, if you cant piss in the tall grass!LOL!



236 posted on 07/09/2003 6:40:28 PM PDT by sarasmom (Punish France.Ignore Germany.Forgive Russia..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
"Someone just went to a whole lot of trouble here...to cause Bush and the White House grief.."

And, evidently, this "Wilkinson" has invested at least twenty years in establishing his bona fides with not only journalists, but congressional Republicans.

Then, only after he nukes a Republican in the White House, does he bother to evaporate into the ether.

This story has very disturbing ramifications. It smells like a KGB "sleeper" who is now, appropriately, getting his paycheck from the DNC.

It also plays to the notion that liberals and al-Qaeda are "natural allies"...

237 posted on 07/09/2003 6:41:24 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Thank you for getting to the bottom of this quickly and in an honorable fashion.
238 posted on 07/09/2003 6:42:57 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
The more people involved in this serious matter, the quicker we ferret out who the telling lies and who is not

Meanwhile, on another newly-born FR thread:

Did Clinton Ever Admit A Mistake? NO!(And the Brits Stand By The Uranium Intel Anyway!)

Rush Limbaugh is saying: Senate Democrats - most of whom are running for president - saw this intelligence too and made these same statements about Saddam. Now they're trying to make the laughable claim that the war wasn't necessary based on this! Meanwhile, the latest Pew poll finds Bush with a 60% approval rating. I also rolled you audio of Reverend Al Sharpton screaming about this nuke intelligence as if the White House admitted to forging it. Again: they did no such thing and made no such admission. This is all about replaying Richard Nixon's fall for the Democrats. They hated Nixon because he exposed a communist - Alger Hiss. Even after the Russians admitted Hiss worked for them, liberals continued to deny he was a communist. They're totally focused on Watergating anyone who gets in their way. It's sickening - but it won't work.

It won't work because patriots won't allow it.

239 posted on 07/09/2003 6:43:23 PM PDT by arasina (Blankety)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic

"Kerry for President!!!"

240 posted on 07/09/2003 6:43:44 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,321-1,340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson