Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilant1; rintense

"He broke the law! He solicited a minor for sex and was presented with a warrant."

No, he was accused of this. People are innocent until proven guilty where I come from.

Ah, so we're to have a trial, before the arrest? Then if the Bad Guy is convicted in the pre-arrest trial, he'll have to come in, but only if it's convenient, and not on a weekend or anything like that, for the real trial. Of course, that's only if there's no fringe on the flag in the courtroom.

Get off it, Vig. There was an arrest warrant for this whackjob. While it's not the case that anyone who is arrested is guilty, it's also true that judges don't just hand out arrest warrants.

The constituitional right to due process does not include taking one's innocent wife hostage and barricading oneself in one's home, and endangering one's neighbors enough to require an evacuation of the 2,011 surrounding acres, and certainly not murdering a police officer.

85 posted on 07/09/2003 7:46:20 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Chemist_Geek
You took what I said completely out of context and made up a load of crap about "pre-arrest" trials. Are you really so bereft of meaningful, pertinent points to make that you must fabricate assinine dreck like this?
97 posted on 07/09/2003 7:56:09 AM PDT by Vigilant1 (The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson