Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police unable to locate barricaded man in burned home's rubble {raid on Michigan Militia Chaplin}
AP via MLive.com (Ann Arbor News) ^ | 7/9/2003 | JAMES PRICHARD

Posted on 07/09/2003 5:52:58 AM PDT by Vigilant1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 621 next last
To: wysiwyg
"Why does every stupid police action amount to a conspiracy?"

They don't always. Only the ones in which the stupidity (and worse) are covered up, such as by burning down houses, bulldozing the scene, and hushing up the truth.
61 posted on 07/09/2003 7:08:47 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: wysiwyg
Why does every stupid police action amount to a conspiracy?

It doesn't. Take for example the rancher who was shooting at the firefighters helicopter. The rancher was clearly wrong. But now look at what happened at Ruby Ridge, Klamath Falls, Ranch Rescue, Lubbock, Waco, ect...

When Houston cops arrested everyone in that Kmart parking lot last year, was that also a conspiracy?

No. But it was abuse of police power. Several people have lost their jobs over that one and the lawsuites are still running.

Cops and their superiors are human, and therefore, prone to error, just like the rest of us.

Now you are in for it. The Flying Monkeys will be around shortly for you daring to suggest that Law Enforcement officials would be anything other than completely trustworthy and ethical in the pursuit of their jobs.

62 posted on 07/09/2003 7:09:29 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
On just an accusation, can't they hold you up to 48 hours? If the crime was that serious that they would need to show up at his home with a TANK, they should have taken him into custody when he came in and gave a statement.
63 posted on 07/09/2003 7:11:05 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Yesterdays thread.
64 posted on 07/09/2003 7:12:15 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Only the ones in which the stupidity (and worse) are covered up, such as by burning down houses, bulldozing the scene, and hushing up the truth.

Waco? I agree with you. This, however, is no Waco.

65 posted on 07/09/2003 7:12:21 AM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
"Did you even read the article ??? It looks like the cops killed one of their own officers when they botched the raid."

The article said no such thing. It said they were going to investigate. They are required to do so.
66 posted on 07/09/2003 7:15:12 AM PDT by Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
hiahc:
"Show me where I said anything other than that he was accused."

Okay, here you go....

hiahc, from post #8:
"He broke the law! He solicited a minor for sex and was presented with a warrant."

----------

hiahc:
"Well, if he'd only gone with the local police to the station when they showed up with a warrant, the "machine guns, helos, and armored vehicles" would never have arrived."

Every indication is that the cops showed up with all the heavy hardware when they served the warrant. You seem to think Barney Fife politely knocked on Woodring's front door, and was sprayed with bullets or something.

Again, we're talking about soliciting, a misdemeanor charge. We're also talking about a man that had already voluntarily appeared and given a statement to the police on the matter. Did the police call him and ask him to come down to the station again? Nope. They saw a chance for a publicity circus, the arrest of militia member with the SWAT team, helos and armored vehicles, and as a result of their lust for face time with the TV cameras, a state trooper is dead and a man accused of a misdemeanor is desperate and on the run.

67 posted on 07/09/2003 7:16:29 AM PDT by Vigilant1 (The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba; Vigilant1; Dead Corpse
They don't always. Only the ones in which the stupidity (and worse) are covered up, such as by burning down houses, bulldozing the scene, and hushing up the truth

Great succinct post. I completely agree with you, Vigilant1 & Dead Corpse, Please ping me further developments. Thanks.

CBJ

68 posted on 07/09/2003 7:16:30 AM PDT by conservababeJen (http://abortiondebate.org/forums)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"No, he was ACCUSED of breaking the law. And the authorities must presume him innocent until proven otherwise."

I may be picking nits here, but isn't it the courts that must presume him innocent? I don't think you, or I, or the police have to presume anything.
69 posted on 07/09/2003 7:18:37 AM PDT by Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

So that's why he decided to shoot at the police who arrived with a lawful warrant in hand, so as to retain his presumed innocence, huh? (sheesh - these ideologues must be employees of Handgun Control, Inc. for they appear to enjoy carrying water for them)

70 posted on 07/09/2003 7:19:53 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Cops and their superiors are human, and therefore, prone to error, just like the rest of us.

Now you are in for it. The Flying Monkeys will be around shortly for you daring to suggest that Law Enforcement officials would be anything other than completely trustworthy and ethical in the pursuit of their jobs.

Please don't go putting words in my mouth. I didn't suggest that they weren't trustworthy or ethical; I said they suffer from the same human fallibility that the rest of us do.
71 posted on 07/09/2003 7:20:03 AM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
A misdemeanor charge? Where did you find that--other than the militia boards, that is. The Free Press, among other media sources, says it was a felony warrant:

State Trooper Kevin Marshall, 33, died after he was shot as he and other State Police officers tried to enter the home Monday. Police said Woodring threatened police from Hesperia when they tried to serve him a felony warrant for soliciting a minor for immoral purposes.

http://www.freep.com/news/mich/stand9_20030709.htm

72 posted on 07/09/2003 7:22:20 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
Every indication is that the cops showed up with all the heavy hardware when they served the warrant.

Well, from yesterday's reports:

Scott Woodring has been holding police at bay at his home on Osborn Avenue since Sunday night. Police say the standoff began when they tried to serve Woodring a warrant for solicitation of prostitution. Police removed Woodring's wife from the home, but he barricaded himself inside, warning early on he had a gun.

Police retreated, calling in reinforcement and heavy artillery. Negotiations soon followed, hours later police felt they had an opportunity to go into the home. Woodring was standing inside with a gun and shot at officers, grazing one of the men and fatally wounding Kevin Marshall.

You seem to think Barney Fife politely knocked on Woodring's front door, and was sprayed with bullets or something.

That's exactly what it sounds like.

73 posted on 07/09/2003 7:24:38 AM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
DC:

Thanks for the link.

============================================================

Everyone:

It's waaaay past my bedtime. Gotta sleep. Nitey-nite....

74 posted on 07/09/2003 7:26:00 AM PDT by Vigilant1 (The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
On just an accusation, can't they hold you up to 48 hours

I think it depends on local law. It may be less than 48 hours in some places.

But why should they even do that, unless or until something happens to push the complaint beyond "he said, she said"? Something like, an additional witness who had been unreachable during the week?

If the crime was that serious that they would need to show up at his home with a TANK, they should have taken him into custody when he came in and gave a statement.

(sigh)

Okay, one more time. The ALLEGED CRIME was not why the armored vehicles were called in. Whether one thinks that "tanks" were a good idea or not, those vehicles only appeared as a result of him refusing to comply with an arrest warrant and barricading himself in his house.

Hesperia and Fremont both have tiny police departments, and I doubt they've even got a helicopter or a tank between them.

75 posted on 07/09/2003 7:26:35 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
His family says he prepared heavily for Y2K and has stock piles of food and supplies in the house.

Eating beans and drinking canned milk for the past 3 years has finally got to him

His family says he is religious and would spend hours studying the bible. His past criminal record includes receiving several tickets for not registering his car.

He hasn't read the parts about following governmental rules

Late Sunday night authorities tried to serve an arrest warrant for soliciting sex from a minor.

He certainly may be innocent. Our constitution grants him the right to due process. Not the right to barracade himself in his home and shoot at the guys with the warrant.

76 posted on 07/09/2003 7:27:02 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
He went in and gave a statement to the police. Why did they not take him into custody then? Why the wait? If the charge was that serious, they should have arrested him when he gave his statement.

If he were arrested at the police station, then the police would not have been able to get into his house to serve the warrant. If he is arrested in the house, police can break into the house to serve the warrant, and can discover any incriminating evidence (guns, lots and lots of guns) in the process of serving the arrest warrant.

If he were arrested anywhere else, they would have to obtain a separate search warrant to search the house. If the case against him (just speculating now) is weak, they would probably not be able to get a search warrant, leaving all of those pretty guns unsiezed.

Now, I'm trying to remember, it's shiny side out, right?

77 posted on 07/09/2003 7:27:49 AM PDT by gridlock (My Dream: Dean and Sharpton duking it out for the nomination on the floor of the 'Rat Convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Yes, he is presumed innocent, but then why refuse the warrant? He isn't letting himself *proven* innocent. So, is it right for everyone who doesn't trust the government to run from a warrant? He has only made it harder on himself.
78 posted on 07/09/2003 7:27:59 AM PDT by rintense (Freedom is contagious, and everyone wants to catch it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: conservababeJen

** ping **

In spite of the best efforts of Mr. Woodring, the Constitution, the rule of law, and civilization are alive and well. Wish we could say the same for Officer Marshall.

79 posted on 07/09/2003 7:28:01 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
Here are two more sources about the felony warrant:

Grand Rapids Press:

Woodring barricaded himself when officers from the Hesperia Police Department and the Newaygo County Sheriff's Department tried to serve him at his Dayton Township home with a felony arrest warrant. The township is adjacent to Fremont, about 30 miles northeast of Muskegon.

WOOD-TV

Woodring barricaded himself when officers from the Hesperia Police Department and the Newaygo County Sheriff's Department tried to serve him at his Dayton Township home with a felony arrest warrant. The township is adjacent to Fremont, about 30 miles northeast of Muskegon.

80 posted on 07/09/2003 7:29:33 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 621 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson