[Jim Robinson]

Good grief. Bush's credibility is on the line becuase of some fossilized tinfoil-hat spook scandal? Guess Bush's credibilty is also on the line because he won't investigate the allegations that Hillary Clinton did in Vince Foster and snuck his dead body out of her Whitehouse office rolled up in a carpet? Or that the CIA did in JFK? Or that Johnson lied about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident? Or that man never walked on the moon? Give us a break, Michelle!

[FairOpinion]

"Bush's credibility is also on the line" because the weatherman predicted rain and it didn't happen. (/sarcasm)

Isn't the power of propaganda amazing, even respectable conservative columnists like Michelle swallow it.

It's also interesting that some keep trying to blame Bush and question his credibility over every little thing, which has absolutely nothing to do with him, at the same time aren't giving him the credit he deserves for his many remarkable achievements: our tremendous success in Afghanistan, Iraq, in the War on Terror, the taxcuts he got through to stimulate the economy, to just name a few.

[DB]

I have a hard time believing software written in the 1980's can do anything very useful spy wise today.

First, the software and its capabilities are known. Any data bases it might have had access to have likely been changed so it can't access them anymore.

Second, without access to secret data it would seem pretty useless.