Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ozzy Says He Now Believes Pot Leads To Other Addictions
MTV ^ | 07.08.2003 | Robert Mancini, with reporting by Gideon Yago

Posted on 07/08/2003 2:31:17 PM PDT by presidio9

Ozzy Osbourne may have weathered the lowest lows that drug addiction has to offer, but the news that his son Jack was seeking treatment for substance abuse taught him a lesson that his own decades of addiction never did.

"I used to think they should legalize pot, but you know what? They should ban the lot," Osbourne told MTV News, addressing Jack's battle for the first time. "One thing leads to another. Coffee leads to Red Bull, Red Bull leads to crank.

"When I found out the full depth of him getting into OxyContin, which is like hillbilly heroin, I was shocked and stunned," Osbourne continued. "The thing that's amazing was how rapidly he went from smoking pot to doing hillbilly heroin."

Ozzy's son entered a California rehabilitation facility in April to battle what was later revealed to be an addiction to the prescription painkiller OxyContin (see "Jack Osbourne Reveals He Was Addicted To Painkiller OxyContin"). Jack also said that he was drinking and using a variety of substances — including Vicodin, Valium, Xanax, Dilaudid, Lorcet, Lortab, Percocet and marijuana — before his trip to rehab (see "Rehab Helps Jack Osbourne Get To Root Of Addiction Problems").

Jack's laundry list of controlled substances made his father painfully aware of just how readily available drugs are. "When I started doing drugs years ago, they were hard to get, but today it's everywhere," Osbourne said. "It's not just America. It's not just California. It's not just Beverly Hills. It's not just downtown New York. It's not just London. It's all over the world" (see "All About OxyContin, The Pills Known As 'Killers' ").

This relatively easy access to allegedly "controlled" substances is especially hard for Ozzy to swallow given his firsthand experience with the damage that drugs can do.

"I'm 55 years old, and I didn't get off scot-free," Osbourne explained. "I have to take medication for the rest of my life because I've done so much neurological damage to my body," Osbourne said.

We'll have much more from our interviews with Ozzy and Jack in an "MTV News Now" special report, premiering Tuesday at 11 p.m. ET/PT (Jack's complete interview will appear on MTVNews.com when the show premieres). The show will be followed the next day by a repeat of MTV News' "True Life: I'm Hooked on OxyContin" at 6:30 p.m.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,661-1,662 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: Bella_Bru
Ozzy PING!

Good for Ozzy. I'm glad he's able to look at things with a (finally) correct perspective. He is the best example of what happens to you when you do drugs and drink. And he's willing to admit that.

103 posted on 07/08/2003 5:25:35 PM PDT by rintense (Freedom is contagious, and everyone wants to catch it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Ozzy is calling for making caffine illegal. Do you agree?
104 posted on 07/08/2003 5:25:46 PM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Gee. What would Ozzy Osbourne know about drug abuse anyway?

Ozzy's continual abuse of substances doesn't qualify him as an expert in its societal dynamics any more than your continual abuse of logic and reason qualify you as an expert in their proper application in rhetoric.

105 posted on 07/08/2003 5:26:51 PM PDT by Pahuanui (when A Foolish Man Hears The tao, He Laughs Out Loud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
"...they tear you a new one."

Only in the same way they win elections. They "attempt" to tear you a new one. You're doing fine.

106 posted on 07/08/2003 5:29:56 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
No psilocybin?

Those are 'shrooms, right? Nah, never got into 'shrooms, except on my steak with 'shrooms and onions....

FMCDH

107 posted on 07/08/2003 5:36:33 PM PDT by nothingnew (the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

The Supreme Court may feel otherwise but since Lawrence v. Texas was ruled on privacy grounds, would they have been so quick to overturn drug laws if the two men had been found smoking pot that they raised in the apartment instead of committing anal sodomy?
108 posted on 07/08/2003 5:40:15 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: weegee
We will have that discussion in 30 years when the federal WOD is over and there are only a couple states still hanging onto prohibition.
109 posted on 07/08/2003 5:42:30 PM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: CWOJackson
Hey, you're earning your stripes when they call you Socialist.

From there, you move up to "Jackboot", "Statist", "Police Statist" and finally "Nazi". And then, if you really make sense, they try to get you banned. Care to go for bonus?

111 posted on 07/08/2003 5:45:35 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Half the people you encounter are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
Lawrence struck down all state sodomy laws and was ruled on privacy grounds.

At least thats what all the ranting on FR said.
112 posted on 07/08/2003 5:47:34 PM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
Admittedly there is a difference between prison and jail, but the bottom line is still the same - exertion of the coercive force of government to deprive an individual of their freedom for some amount of time.
113 posted on 07/08/2003 5:52:18 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
Admittedly there is a difference between prison and jail, but the bottom line is still the same - exertion of the coercive force of government to deprive an individual of their freedom for some amount of time.
114 posted on 07/08/2003 5:52:19 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
All states have dropped their sodomy laws (homosexual and heterosexual) with the Lawrence v. Texas ruling.

Try again.

115 posted on 07/08/2003 5:55:28 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: ianincali
Nice debating skills there ace.
117 posted on 07/08/2003 5:58:46 PM PDT by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
Bottom line: Being black and sitting at the back of the bus in mississippi is illegal! Don't like it, Move!

Sorry, we love america too. We plan on asserting our right to petition for redress of grievances. Don't like it, Move!
118 posted on 07/08/2003 5:59:37 PM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
Bulls**t....That is just a lie. Marijuana kills brain cells too.

MYTH: MARIJUANA KILLS BRAIN CELLS. Used over time, marijuana permanently alters brain structure and function, causing memory loss, cognitive impairment, personality deterioration, and reduced productivity.

FACT: None of the medical tests currently used to detect brain damage in humans have found harm from marijuana, even from long term high-dose use. An early study reported brain damage in rhesus monkeys after six months exposure to high concentrations of marijuana smoke. In a recent, more carefully conducted study, researchers found no evidence of brain abnormality in monkeys that were forced to inhale the equivalent of four to five marijuana cigarettes every day for a year. The claim that marijuana kills brain cells is based on a speculative report dating back a quarter of a century that has never been supported by any scientific study.

Lynn Zimmer and John Morgan. Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts: A Review of the Scientific Evidence, (New York: The Lindesmith Center, 1997).

119 posted on 07/08/2003 5:59:55 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (twankies with them hundred spokes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: toothless
Err, make that front. Too much red bull I guess.
120 posted on 07/08/2003 6:00:24 PM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,661-1,662 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson