The 'dishonorable conduct' in question is specifically homosexual conduct. The Don't Ask Don't Tell Don't Pursue policy is the procedural guideline which governs applications of the homosexual conduct provision of the UCMJ. Either it was followed, or it was not. In the event that this policy was not followed, then the application is legally invalid. Whatever the case, if the particular provision [i.e. the federal anti-sodomy statute] is unconstitutional, then any discharge under that specific provision would also be invalidated...