Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tdadams
Capitol Hill Blue is NOT reliable & is just shy of World Weekly ... the guy who founded it is good of heart but their journalistic ethos are highly questionable and it wouldn't be the first time they've outright made things up.
8 posted on 07/08/2003 11:47:37 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.
PS - recall that Capitol Hill Blue was one of those who outright got down on his knees and swallowed Sid Blumenthal's spin that Clinton was caught snorting cocaine with Monica in the oval office and that helped lead to Clinton's being let off the hook in the Senate because, by all other comparisons, obstruction of justice just didn't seem that severe anymore. So use the Clintonista's tactics against them, now that so many were burned first time around believing Capitol Hill Blue - when the lefties use this article to bash Bush, just remind them that they're using the same source that published similary questionable articles about Clinton.
11 posted on 07/08/2003 11:50:34 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
You're right. I have no idea why, but as I was typing 'Capitol Hill Blue' I was thinking 'Roll Call'. Two different things.
19 posted on 07/08/2003 11:52:30 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; OldFriend
It's 'here-we-go-again' time!

Bush didn't "LIE" --- he stated 'facts' that he was assured were true at the time. Only of late, has the original 'top-secret' info been shown to be falsified.

Sheeeeeeeesh. Some people, (even here) act like salivating democrats lying in wait to "get" POTUS.
32 posted on 07/08/2003 11:55:28 AM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
"Capitol Hill Blue is NOT reliable & is just shy of World Weekly ... the guy who founded it is good of heart but their journalistic ethos are highly questionable and it wouldn't be the first time they've outright made things up."

I've enjoyed Thompson's rants but I have also gathered that he also hates Bush. This title pretty much confirms that...

41 posted on 07/08/2003 12:02:36 PM PDT by eureka! (Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
True, sort of like Worldnetdaily.com, which at one time I thought was a great web paper...wrong. I found out about FreeRepublic on WND and been here since, I haven't gone back to post or read like I used to.
49 posted on 07/08/2003 12:11:39 PM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Ain't nothing worse than feeling obsolete....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
Rush dealt with this issue today and what he had to say about it will probably be on his web site later today after it is updated to reflect today's program.

Hannity is talking about it at this very moment on his radio show. [3:20 PM EDT]
65 posted on 07/08/2003 12:24:21 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (Marxist DemocRATS, Nader-Greens, and Religious KOOKS = a clear and present danger to our Freedoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson