Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom4US
I tend to think they would answer in the affirmative.

I think so, too, without a doubt. Even Hamilton, great "centralizer" that he was, acknowledged as much in The Federalist.

A government that de facto expunges the Constitution is illegitimate on its face; for it is usurping the sovereignty of the people, which is the ultimate foundation of the Constitution, and the political order premised on it.

Should the government so exceed its warrant from the people (and their posterity, of and for whom We the People so clearly spoke in the Preamble) as to do such a thing, the question then becomes a rather thorny one: The government has the de facto AND de jure monopoly of force (except that teeny little bit of it preserved to the people by the Second Amendment).

Before anyone opens that can of worms, I think we ought to get some justices impeached first.

21 posted on 07/08/2003 1:42:31 PM PDT by betty boop (We can have either human dignity or unfettered liberty, but not both. -- Dean Clancy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
BINGO, Betty Boop!

A government that de facto expunges the Constitution is illegitimate on its face; for it is usurping the sovereignty of the people, which is the ultimate foundation of the Constitution, and the political order premised on it. ....Betty Boop

23 posted on 07/08/2003 5:34:34 PM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson