Posted on 07/08/2003 7:31:03 AM PDT by thepainster
Space shuttle test reveals 'smoking gun' in disaster Simulation of Columbia launch mishap puts hole in wing section
By Kathy Sawyer
THE WASHINGTON POST
Tuesday, July 8, 2003
SAN ANTONIO -- With a resounding "thwack," a piece of foam traveling at 500 mph blew a ragged hole the size of a stop sign in a section of a space shuttle wing Monday, effectively shattering any remaining doubts about what destroyed Columbia and its crew Feb. 1.
"We have found the smoking gun," said Scott Hubbard, a member of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board who supervised the test.
Austin American Statesman Link
(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...
I'm trying to get a handle on your thought processes. First, it appears that you feel I shouldn't express a viewpoint that isn't held by the majority. Second you imply that the the majority determines what is right and what is wrong. Well I disagree with both points. I don't give a rat's backside what the majority thinks, and second that are moral absolutes, and what is right and wrong is not determined by whatever the majority of idiots thinks. After all the majority wanted Klinton for president for 8 years.
"Thou shalt not steal" is , at least to me, one of the moral absolutes. It doesn't matter if the stealing if being done by an unorganized petty thief or the worst gang of all, the government, it's still stealing, and I would like to see the constitutional authority that grants the government the power to rob me to make "bike paths" Like you I will probably never use them. Unlike you, I don't see that taking the money that I earned to squander on parks, or bike paths that I won't use has any moral justification. Unlike you, I don't have the perverted liberal definition of "selfishness." According to you "selfish" is wanting to keep the money I worked for, and "unselfish" is a gang of self appointed thieves taiking my earnings at gunpoint and squandering them on something they want.
If you want to worship government go ahead, but that sort of attitude is not conservatism, it's statism or fascism or marxism depending on the details.
Just out of curiosity; how much do you voluntarily contribute to the government above and beyond your taxes? After all if you think government spending is such a good thing then you should give them even more of your money than they demand. I personally only yield what I am forced to.
there are many legitimate areas where the only entity able to provide a community service is the community government.
You are completey wrong on this you are indeed very much "confused" but you should try to get over it, and I'll even help. The only legitimate areas for government action are those defined by the constitution. The constitution is the basic contract between the citizens and the government and anything that the government does beyond this is both unconstitutional and immoral. Law is just a tool of the government. Generally the law is whatever the government wants it to be and is in any case meaningless when you consider that there are over 140,000 pages in the federal register today. No on can possibly know all of that and it's sole purpose is to let the government screw anyone the bureaucrats target (like poor Martha Stewart who is being prosecuted so that the government attorney can make a name for himself like that a$$hole Gulliani) rather than to protect the property and freedom of the citizens.
Yes and these powers and their limitations are precisely enumerated in the constitution. I don't see libraries, bike paths, or parks anywhere in that document.
It's also a *rides* program for wannabe passengers--and vicarious passengers. The future is in robotics, at least for our lifetime. Check out the rover for some real excitement--
I don't believe the constitution applies to what your community government decides to fund. If all your libraries and parks were paid for by the Federal goverment, then I think you'd have a point.
Yes - nothing about parks and bike paths in it.
Do you know what rules apply to your city government?
Fortunately I don't live in a city, so only the county charter applies, and I must confess I haven't read it nor can I even find a copy of it. My point remains that unlimited government is just robbery on a grand scale, and that regardless of any constitutional constraints, governments at all levels have metastasized into all intrusive organizations that pursue their own aims at the expense of the taxpayers. If you want bike paths and parks you get together with other people who want them and you pay for them. If you force me to pay for your (recreation, healthcare, fill in the blank) then what you are practicing is a combination of robbery and receiving stolen goods.
You are either missing my point or ignoring it and that is it isn't the government's business (government at any level) to steal from one group and pander to the other with the stolen goods. And, if you think that federal tax dollars aren't used by local governments to pay for some of the stupid stuff that they do, you aren't paying attention to the world around you.
I'm not missing your point. I just don't agree with it. I believe local governments should collect taxes and pay for things that benefit the community. The local government should be the servant of the community by doing things for the community collectively that the community would have a difficult or impossible time doing as individuals. I am fully aware that in the real world, these governmental powers are often abused, but that doesn't mean that all government is evil. Governments are necessary and have their rightful place.
The founding fathers limited the power of the Federal government in the constitution because they didn't want the Federal government doing things that were rightfully taken care of by local governments.
And, if you think that federal tax dollars aren't used by local governments to pay for some of the stupid stuff that they do, you aren't paying attention to the world around you.
I agree with you that federal tax dollars should not be used for these purposes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.