Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Jennings Takes Up U.S. Citizenship ... Finally!!!
The Ottawa Citizen | July 8, 2003. | Randy Boswell

Posted on 07/08/2003 7:01:01 AM PDT by BluH2o

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: BluH2o
I hope to have my citizenship before the next election - so I will cancel out his vote!
41 posted on 07/08/2003 11:24:44 AM PDT by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
After telling Americans for decades how they should vote (democ"rat") Peter Jennings can now participate in an election as a voter.

I hope that is the extent of it. Maybe he wants to run for public office.

42 posted on 07/08/2003 11:30:37 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
He's retaining his Canadian citizenship ...

I don't think that America supports much dual citizenship.

I tried to find details explaining it on a government site but could not (quickly). Here is a website that went into it. If Petah had been born in Canada to American parents (and raised in America) then he might have qualified. I beleive that our loyalty oath prohibits dual alligence.

Dual Citizenship FAQ: Dual Nationality and United States Law

Countries usually frame their citizenship laws with little or no regard for the citizenship laws of other countries. In my son's case, for instance, the US does not care that Canada thinks he is a Canadian citizen, and Canada does not care that the US thinks he is a US citizen. Sometimes a country may seek to restrict dual citizenship by requiring one of its citizens born with some other citizenship to renounce (give up) the other citizenship upon reaching adulthood. Newly naturalized citizens may similarly be required to renounce their previous citizenship(s); the US has such a requirement, for example, but Canada does not. In some cases, a country will automatically revoke the citizenship of one of its citizens who acquires another country's citizenship by naturalization, even if no explicit renunciation was involved.

Where one country requires a citizen to renounce the citizenship of another country, this renunciation may or may not be recognized by the other country. This can sometimes lead to sticky legal situations. Also, countries which require such renunciations differ in how seriously they treat this requirement. In some cases (such as Singapore), an applicant for naturalization may be required by his new country to go to an embassy or consulate of his old country and renounce his old citizenship in a manner prescribed by his old country's laws. Other countries (such as the US in recent years) may treat their own naturalization oaths' renunciatory language as essentially meaningless and take no steps to enforce it at all.


43 posted on 07/08/2003 11:45:56 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Helms
At least it shows that we are not mind numbed robots if the "master" is taking bits from us.

Rush reportedly gave FR a plug yesterday in reference to the moron.org online activism and poll that put Howard Dean on top.

I think that one thread even said he had a hot link on his website to Free Republic in his writeup about conservative activism on the web.

44 posted on 07/08/2003 11:52:00 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I don't think that America supports much dual citizenship.

A former Canadian I became a US citizen in 1974. At that time you could not carry dual citizenship. Don't recall the specifics but in order to have US citizenship you had to give up your claim to your original citizenship.

45 posted on 07/08/2003 11:57:04 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
bump
46 posted on 07/08/2003 12:07:07 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sloth; wildbill; river rat; weegee

The Oath of Citizenship

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God. In acknowledgement whereof I have hereunto affixed my signature.

Cordially,

47 posted on 07/08/2003 12:11:48 PM PDT by Diamond (Husband of wife over 40)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
HILLARY running for Pres/2004 =

Friend of HILLARY ..TOM BROKAW.. holds off retiring till after the 2004 Election

Friend of HILLARY ..PETER JENNINGS.. suddenly becomes an American Citizen prior the the 2004 Election

Propaganda is as Propaganda does..?
48 posted on 07/08/2003 12:21:52 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.comw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
"Mr. Jennings, who will retain his Canadian citizenship, quickly added: "That does not for a second, as any smart American will tell you, mean you have to renounce your roots."

This should never be allowed. One or the other, we don't need no steeekin dual loyalties.

49 posted on 07/08/2003 12:25:26 PM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Answer: One more communist vote against all conservative candidates.
50 posted on 07/08/2003 12:29:46 PM PDT by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
He wants to vote against GW that bad?
51 posted on 07/08/2003 12:31:36 PM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Petah:

"My mom was very, very, very deeply Canadian, and to some extent quite anti-American."

What a condescending, smarmy POS, I'm smarter than you crap is that.

"and to some extent quite anti-American"- ok Peter, some of us graduated college with English backgrounds, and your sentence here is a contrived and an obvious piece of Clintonesque crap verbosity.

In this regard, Brian Williams has nothing on you.

52 posted on 07/08/2003 1:04:17 PM PDT by Helms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
now when he votes for democrats he can do it legally.
53 posted on 07/08/2003 1:11:23 PM PDT by smadurski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Perhaps we can toss him out for lying when he took the loyalty oath.
54 posted on 07/08/2003 1:15:31 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
And my response to him is "Who the "H" cares? He'll never be an American Citizen in my book.
55 posted on 07/08/2003 1:23:09 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

56 posted on 07/08/2003 1:31:00 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
We should have deported the liberal-democRAT for sedition/treason, years ago. All we can do now is tune him out, and watch ABC's rating go down the dumper; him with it.
57 posted on 07/08/2003 1:46:09 PM PDT by Hinoki Cypress (At 53, it's the miles, not the years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helms
an obvious piece of Clintonesque crap verbosity.

I like it!
I still remember when he loftily intoned "Let us roll". He's the dictionary definition of smarmy to me.

58 posted on 07/08/2003 1:49:22 PM PDT by Constitution Day (Remember! Only! You! Can! Prevent! Exclamation! Abuse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
it means nothing to him. notice the dual citizenship dig.
59 posted on 07/08/2003 1:57:20 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
the us does not recognize dual citizenship, even if canada does.
60 posted on 07/08/2003 1:59:07 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson