[Sub]

Most may not want to read this article here, but it critiques Treason better than any I've seen. These guys cite specific examples of how she distorts facts, twists what people say, and makes claims that are factually just false. Gotta respect that they actually took the time to do so, and didn't just come up with a diatribe of how crazy she seems. There's a link in the article that takes you to a shredding of Slander, as well. I actually like her passion, and respect where she's coming from as an individual voice. I don't agree with her, but she's got a fire that's necessary in this country. After reading this, though, I can't really take here seriously.

http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20030630.html

[FreedomPoster]

OK, one question. Do they address the fundamental questions of, Were Soviet communist agents and their helpers in government during the McCarthy era? and Were liberal Democrats guilty of covering up for them?

[pissant]

Spinsanity claims to have de-bumked Slander which was 98% accurate. So why would you look to them for reasoned rebuttal to Ann's newest book. I read the Spinsanity and its a very weak attempt.

[DPB101]

How do you account for the flat out untruths in this article? Horowitz claims Coulter did not acknowledge the anticommunism of Hubert Humphrey. She did. She said Humphrey was rougher on communists than McCarthy was. There are several more inaccuracies cited at the start of this thread. I suspect Horowitz did not read the book. He certainly didn't fact check.