Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposition 187, Arizona-style
E-mail | 7 July 2003 | Kathy McKee

Posted on 07/07/2003 3:39:59 PM PDT by JackelopeBreeder

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Kathy McKee JULY 4, 2003 PHONE: 623.225.7122

NEWS RELEASE . NEWS CONFERENCE ANNOUNCING BIGGEST POLITICAL NEWS IN ARIZONA FOR 2003 PROPOSITION 187-TYPE INITIATIVE HEADING FOR AZ BALLOT 10 a.m. Tuesday, July 8, 2003 State Capitol . 1700 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ . House Hearing Room 4-5

The Protect Arizona NOW Committee has filed application with the Arizona Secretary of State to begin collecting signatures for a citizens' initiative similar to California's Proposition 187 for the 2004 ballot in Arizona. The Arizona Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act would ban the use of taxpayer funds for all state and local programs, services, and benefits for illegal aliens, except those mandated by federal law.

Committee Director Kathy McKee states, "The original Prop 187 in California passed with about a 2/3 majority and in all counties except eight in and around San Francisco. State and local officials-especially the current Governor, Phoenix City Council, and Tucson City Council, seem determined to tax citizens to death and run our entire state into perpetual bankruptcy supporting people who legally should be deported.

So we, the citizens of this state, have no other choice but to pursue and pass this initiative. We have been organizing for months and have the early stages of a great network and system in place to anticipate a greater margin of victory here than in California."

Committee Treasurer, local businessman Rusty Childress, adds, "The people of Arizona have heard more than enough of state and local officials' lame excuse that illegal immigration is a federal problem. Clearly, the federal government is endangering the whole country by not putting the military on our own borders-like the vast majority of Americans want done, but a lot of the underlying problem is that state and local governments have created a mammoth welfare state-illegally, with taxpayers' money-that attracts illegals here. These traitorous bureaucrats thumb their noses at their legal constituents and blatantly violate laws, even U.S. Supreme Court decisions. If elected leaders don't have the courage or integrity to stop this nonsense right now, the citizens of this state do have it and will stop it. "

McKee contends, "The real villain in the illegal immigration crisis is every level of 'our' own government (and I use the word "our" very loosely). However, I dare say every person coming across that border illegally knows they are breaking our laws. Even for those who say they are coming here to try to improve their lives, poverty is no excuse to break laws-and we surely can't take in the 4-5 billion people on this planet who are poorer than Central Americans. I love Arizona, and I am furious how government officials are just giving it away-and using taxpayers' money to do it. Why? Why? Why? The average Arizonan has no idea how many hundreds of millions of their tax dollars go to support programs and benefits for illegal aliens."

Senior Advisors to the Committee, Arizona House Majority Whip Randy Graf and House Appropriations Chairman Russell Pearce, will be on the news conference panel to better explain the fiscal impact and irresponsibility of spending public funds on people illegally in this country.

McKee concludes, "Instead of Emailing back and forth and griping to each other, it's truly now or never for the citizens of Arizona to demand accountability and enforcement of our laws by government officials. It's hard to believe America has become a place where citizens have to force their own government to obey laws."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 187; aliens; illegals; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: TheSpottedOwl
The man has lost his direction. He's on his way to Africa, but left all the doors and windows to the house wide open.
41 posted on 07/07/2003 5:31:49 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
They didn't anticpate ensuring that California would vote Democrat for the next twenty years.

The PRI party got their vote for 70 years and now they've got it again but the even more leftist party is gaining power. PRI is as corrupt as the Democrat party is here. 20 years is nothing. It's a one-party country moving in.

42 posted on 07/07/2003 5:32:59 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: DLfromthedesert
I believe that 68% approval number came from a poll conducted by the Public Television station - not excacly "fair and balanced"
44 posted on 07/07/2003 6:05:40 PM PDT by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
They rejected PAN which isn't really conservative by our standards but is the most conservative party in Mexico.

Mostly because PAN talked big and delivered small.

45 posted on 07/07/2003 6:39:55 PM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
So you think our Butch governor will fight for it if a court shoots it down?

janetgreen is rolling on the floor laughing... No, I don't think she will. I think she's really Gray Davis in drag!

46 posted on 07/07/2003 8:05:33 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder
Best of luck!

Cause/Effect
Don't blame the border crossers, blame the Welfare State.

47 posted on 07/07/2003 10:03:14 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder
I doubt it will pass, it makes entirely too much sense.
48 posted on 07/08/2003 4:18:19 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder
I can hear them now .. ..

OWWWWWWWWW!!!!

49 posted on 07/08/2003 6:20:31 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder; All
Tucson Daily Star's POLL: Please vote quickly.

http://regulus.azstarnet.com/hourlyupdate/story.php?id=52http://regulus.azstarnet.com/hourlyupdate/story.php?id=52

50 posted on 07/09/2003 6:48:17 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (DHS BCBP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
For example, 187 had no severability clause.

I just read it, it has a severability clause.

51 posted on 07/09/2003 10:39:51 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (DHS BCBP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
For example, 187 had no severability clause.

I just read it, it has a severability clause.

52 posted on 07/09/2003 10:39:57 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (DHS BCBP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause.
53 posted on 07/09/2003 10:40:43 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause.

Wrong again eh Poo?

54 posted on 07/09/2003 10:41:50 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Treasure the moment, because it's so rare that I'm wrong.

Any time you're RIGHT is even rarer.
55 posted on 07/09/2003 10:52:58 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Do you really, I mean really think prop 187 was thrown out by the government due to the measure being written badly. You can't be serious.....

There was no severability clause in Proposition 187. Without a severability clause, all that the opponents needed to do was get ONE very small piece of the initiative overturned, and the entire thing went with it. And it was 99% certain that some parts of the initiative were going to get shot down. The guys who wrote the initiative didn't think ahead, and the thing died right there.

More Bravo Sierra......

Yeah, it was badly written. The opponents used that to get the whole thing thrown out. Tough s**t.

Tough s**t, LOL!

56 posted on 07/09/2003 10:58:30 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause.

I was speaking of the Arizona initiative, not California's Prop 187. Sorry for the miscommunication.

I have no idea if Prop 187 had a severability clause, but the Arizona initiative does.

57 posted on 07/09/2003 11:29:50 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (DHS BCBP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Joe Hadenuf
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause.

I was speaking of the Arizona initiative, not California's Prop 187. Sorry for the miscommunication.

I have no idea if Prop 187 had a severability clause, but the Arizona initiative does.

58 posted on 07/09/2003 11:30:46 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (DHS BCBP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Joe Hadenuf
Sorry for the double post.

59 posted on 07/09/2003 11:32:44 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (DHS BCBP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder
Where can one sign these petitions?
60 posted on 07/09/2003 2:30:20 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (I want a Napolitano recall NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson