Skip to comments.
Proposition 187, Arizona-style
E-mail
| 7 July 2003
| Kathy McKee
Posted on 07/07/2003 3:39:59 PM PDT by JackelopeBreeder
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: TheSpottedOwl
The man has lost his direction. He's on his way to Africa, but left all the doors and windows to the house wide open.
41
posted on
07/07/2003 5:31:49 PM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
To: Poohbah
They didn't anticpate ensuring that California would vote Democrat for the next twenty years. The PRI party got their vote for 70 years and now they've got it again but the even more leftist party is gaining power. PRI is as corrupt as the Democrat party is here. 20 years is nothing. It's a one-party country moving in.
42
posted on
07/07/2003 5:32:59 PM PDT
by
FITZ
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
To: DLfromthedesert
I believe that 68% approval number came from a poll conducted by the Public Television station - not excacly "fair and balanced"
44
posted on
07/07/2003 6:05:40 PM PDT
by
azcap
To: FITZ
They rejected PAN which isn't really conservative by our standards but is the most conservative party in Mexico.Mostly because PAN talked big and delivered small.
45
posted on
07/07/2003 6:39:55 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
To: DLfromthedesert
So you think our Butch governor will fight for it if a court shoots it down? janetgreen is rolling on the floor laughing... No, I don't think she will. I think she's really Gray Davis in drag!
To: JackelopeBreeder
Best of luck!
Cause/Effect
Don't blame the border crossers, blame the Welfare State.
47
posted on
07/07/2003 10:03:14 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: JackelopeBreeder
I doubt it will pass, it makes entirely too much sense.
48
posted on
07/08/2003 4:18:19 AM PDT
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: JackelopeBreeder
I can hear them now .. ..
OWWWWWWWWW!!!!
49
posted on
07/08/2003 6:20:31 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: JackelopeBreeder; All
To: Poohbah
For example, 187 had no severability clause. I just read it, it has a severability clause.
To: Poohbah
For example, 187 had no severability clause. I just read it, it has a severability clause.
To: Marine Inspector
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause.
53
posted on
07/09/2003 10:40:43 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: Poohbah
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause.Wrong again eh Poo?
54
posted on
07/09/2003 10:41:50 AM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
To: Joe Hadenuf
Treasure the moment, because it's so rare that I'm wrong.
Any time you're RIGHT is even rarer.
55
posted on
07/09/2003 10:52:58 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: Poohbah
Do you really, I mean really think prop 187 was thrown out by the government due to the measure being written badly. You can't be serious.....
There was no severability clause in Proposition 187. Without a severability clause, all that the opponents needed to do was get ONE very small piece of the initiative overturned, and the entire thing went with it. And it was 99% certain that some parts of the initiative were going to get shot down. The guys who wrote the initiative didn't think ahead, and the thing died right there.
More Bravo Sierra......
Yeah, it was badly written. The opponents used that to get the whole thing thrown out. Tough s**t.
Tough s**t, LOL!
56
posted on
07/09/2003 10:58:30 AM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
To: Poohbah
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause. I was speaking of the Arizona initiative, not California's Prop 187. Sorry for the miscommunication.
I have no idea if Prop 187 had a severability clause, but the Arizona initiative does.
To: Poohbah; Joe Hadenuf
OK, I was mistaken--one of the complaints by an anti-immigration group at the time was that it lacked a severability clause. I was speaking of the Arizona initiative, not California's Prop 187. Sorry for the miscommunication.
I have no idea if Prop 187 had a severability clause, but the Arizona initiative does.
To: Poohbah; Joe Hadenuf
Sorry for the double post.
To: JackelopeBreeder
Where can one sign these petitions?
60
posted on
07/09/2003 2:30:20 PM PDT
by
hsmomx3
(I want a Napolitano recall NOW!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson