[weegee]

Where's the outrage? I find the Prizewinner's comments much more offensive because he says that he would have killed his unborn son rather than brought him into this world.

I believe him too. I don't believe that Michael Savage wanted that caller to die of AIDS or choking. He did want to respond to that caller's personal insult which Michael was able to hear on his earpiece with like sentiments.

What did the Nobel Prizewinner's son ever do to have his dad say that had he known about his birth defect he would have killed him?

[Cultural Jihad]

The issue isn't Mr. Watson's comments, but Mr. Weiner's. Are you advocating for a Constitutional admendment for the equality of all consequences to all outrages? If so, then good luck, and may the chains of your ideology rest lightly upon you.

[Doctor Stochastic]

I don't believe that Michael Savage wanted that caller to die of AIDS or choking.

Then why did Savage say so? Do you believe that he was just lying?