[Dont Mention the War]

Sorry, but SCOTUS unanimously disagrees with you. Look here.

No, that's a copyright violation case you linked to. This case is about trademark violation, a completely different area of the law. mhking did make a mistake when he said "FNC has to protect its copyright." He should have said "FNC has to protect its trademark." We covered that earlier up in the thread, though.

[Straight Vermonter]

No, that's a copyright violation case you linked to. This case is about trademark violation, a completely different area of the law. Ok then refer to Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records for the exact same outcome on a case that is specifically about a parody of a trademark. This is the US 9th circuit though not SCOTUS.