[Wolfstar]

Re your post #100, since you asked: It attempt to refute points in the article. If you want a response to your refutation, contact the man who wrote the article.

As for the "agenda" you think you spotted, think again. The operative phrase is "in contrast," the contrast in that particular case being to an article that discussed the charitable works of other drivers.

As for venom, when you mention Adam Petty in the vein and tone you did, it speaks volumes about the kind of person you are. He was a 19-year-old kid when he died. He never had a chance to live his life. People like you, who presumably are trying to defend the name Earnhardt, do nothing but disgrace it.

[Vigilantcitizen]

"Re your post #100, since you asked: It attempt to refute points in the article. If you want a response to your refutation, contact the man who wrote the article."

That's what I thought.

"As for venom, when you mention Adam Petty in the vein and tone you did, it speaks volumes about the kind of person you are. He was a 19-year-old kid when he died. He never had a chance to live his life. People like you, who presumably are trying to defend the name Earnhardt, do nothing but disgrace it."

I said nothing about Adam in a specific singular example, but rather amongst a group of drivers who have had a head start in racing due to their lineage, in response to your "Junior was born with a silver spoon in his mouth" comment. You're projecting.

People like you that resort to personal attacks because they have nothing of substance to respond with on this forum do nothing but disgrace it.