Replies

I found O'Conners comments actually more frightening. The end around they have in mind is to sign international treaties that do things like "International Accord on the Control of Small Arms" does, and require gun confiscation and registration. They will then trot out their "treties are co-equal with the Constitution" line (that Sandra is trying on for size) and find that the newer treaty superceeds the older Constitutional Ammendmnet.

This is exactly the stuff that people like Phillis Schafley have been warning about for a decade. There can be no clearer sign that they are getting ready to use this than them starting to remind us about this obscure (and probably wrong) interpretation of the Constitution.

Bush gets '04, but obviously Hillary is the medias pick in '08. Thats when the real fun will begin.

I'm getting to the point with Bush incrementalism (health care benefits, TSA idiots at the airport, etc) that I might rather take my next big dose of Socialism and Fascism together in one big gulp by the big bad nurse Hillary than let the orderly give it to me in little doses for the next 4 years.

I'm not getting any younger and I want to be here for the next chapter.

that I might rather take my next big dose of Socialism and Fascism together in one big gulp by the big bad nurse Hillary than let the orderly give it to me in little doses for the next 4 years.

That is just what I posted the other night. Why baby step it any more? Thetrain has left the station and I don't see any turn offs. Let's just go straight to the eye of the storm and get this sh** over with.