Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Breyer: U. S. Constitution should be subordinated to international will
WorldNetDaily ^ | July 7, 2003

Posted on 07/07/2003 7:00:07 AM PDT by mrobison

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-582 next last
To: mrobison
I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.''
41 posted on 07/07/2003 7:25:59 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Oh, it's my fault that these Justices are out of control.

You are a joke.
42 posted on 07/07/2003 7:26:44 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
I am saving this one. It is unbelievable to see this in public print; these justices are so arrogant as to believe the U.S. Constitution is trending towards irrelevancy in a world more dangerous than at any other time in history.

They need to be spanked, bigtime.
43 posted on 07/07/2003 7:28:10 AM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Not often that one sees "vis a vis" and "cripes" in the same post. :-)
44 posted on 07/07/2003 7:28:44 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (http://c-pol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry; tpaine
To:Antiguv

From the majority in Lawrence vs Texas

The European Court of Human Rights has followed not Bowers but its own decision in Dudgeon v. United Kingdom. See P. G. & J. H. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 00044787/98, ¶ ;56 (Eur. Ct. H. R., Sept. 25, 2001); Modinos v. Cyprus, 259 Eur. Ct. H. R. (1993); Norris v. Ireland, 142 Eur. Ct. H. R. (1988).

Certainly he did unless the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Ireland are the 51, 52 and 53 states.

He also cited Mary Robinsons amicus brief. Did Burger?

13 posted on 07/03/2003 2:38 PM EDT by jwalsh07

45 posted on 07/07/2003 7:29:21 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Thanks, the vis a vis comes from my pal Torie, the Cripes is a cleanup of my New York upbringing. LOL
47 posted on 07/07/2003 7:30:36 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Its the same old crap from Breyer and his twin Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg. Could someone tell me WHY the Republicans didn't filibuster these two world federalist liberals appointed by clinton? -- instead I remember even conservatives in the Senate falling over each other in praising them.
48 posted on 07/07/2003 7:30:47 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
I could just spit.
49 posted on 07/07/2003 7:31:49 AM PDT by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
I think its high time we clean that snake pit out. Any federal official can be impeached from office. Breyer seems to feel the COnstitution is an antiquated document. This is an excerpted text from a 1957 Supreme Court Impeachment attempt: Whereas, the Constitution provides in Article I and repeatedly elsewhere in plain, simple words that all legislative powers granted to the United States are vested in the Congress of the United States; and Whereas, a republic is "a government of laws and not of men" in which all laws are established by the people themselves, either by immemorial customs or by their own elected representatives in legislative assemblies established for such purpose; yet, nevertheless, laws established by immemorial customs, (or common law) were not adjusted to and hence were not adopted by the Constitution for the Union, and hence the federal judiciary was given no jurisdiction of such laws. Thus "judicial power" was "extended" by Article III from nothing in the Articles of Confederation to "cases," in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their "authority" in Article III. "Judicial power" was further "extended" in Article III so as to permit the federal judiciary to try "cases and controversies" depending upon the laws of nations and of states, in certain clearly defined and specified instances; and, Whereas, Article VI of the Constitution plainly provides that nothing except the Constitution itself, laws enacted by Congress in accordance with the Constitution and treaties theretofore existing or which should thereafter be made in accordance with the Constitution, should be the "law of the land" "supreme" over the constitution and laws of the several states; and, Whereas, the usurpation of power by an officer of government is such misconduct as constitutes a misdemeanor within the meaning of Article II of the Constitution, and the promotion of the cause of and shielding adherents to communism is the giving of aid or comfort to the enemies of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment; and Whereas, the following named Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States under the color of their offices and while purporting to exercise powers vested in them as members of the Supreme Court of the United States have unlawfully usurped the powers of the people to amend the Constitution and have exercised legislative powers vested solely in the Congress, or reserved to the states, or to the people and have given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States in the manners hereafter specified Fits quite well, doesnt it?
50 posted on 07/07/2003 7:32:42 AM PDT by judicial meanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: .45MAN
It's all down hill now !

You've got *that* right.

52 posted on 07/07/2003 7:33:11 AM PDT by dansangel (America - love it, support it or LEAVE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Excuses are like as... rectums. They all stink and everyone has one.
53 posted on 07/07/2003 7:34:28 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages; martin_fierro
Pinging my lawyerly friends.....
54 posted on 07/07/2003 7:34:37 AM PDT by dansangel (America - love it, support it or LEAVE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Its the same old crap from Breyer and his twin Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg. Could someone tell me WHY the Republicans didn't filibuster these two world federalist liberals appointed by clinton? -- instead I remember even conservatives in the Senate falling over each other in praising them

Because at the time of their appointments, there was a 200 year precedent in the Senate not to filabuster judicial nominations, that precedent was broken by Dashole in 2002.

Oh and the demos also had the majority in the Senate at the time.

55 posted on 07/07/2003 7:35:02 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: freedomsnotfree
They had TV before the Civil War? :)
56 posted on 07/07/2003 7:35:40 AM PDT by mrobison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Can justices be removed from the bench?

Article III, Section 1: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour...

Unfortunately, in the real world, "good behavior" is politically defined, not constitutionally defined. Breyer will never suffer consequences for his views unless We The People made it politically dangerous for Congress to ignore him. Not gonna happen, not in our lifetimes, I'm afraid.

57 posted on 07/07/2003 7:36:39 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (http://c-pol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedomsnotfree
I actually showed this to my roomates here - all of us are going into the military - and i'll tell you this - we will uphold the Constitution till death. The scary thing is - the military is becoming extremely powerful - it already is - now super weapons like those in sci fi movies are being created - which will make it extremely difficult for freedom fighters to even have a chance.
58 posted on 07/07/2003 7:36:51 AM PDT by Norse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast
Excuses are like as... rectums. They all stink and everyone has one

And loud mouth malcontents who refuse to look at history, usually have the biggest ones.

59 posted on 07/07/2003 7:36:56 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson