Replies

Two columns, in two days, vilifying Ann and McCarthy ? I rather think that old Dorothy has something hidden in her past. Even neocons ( using the REAL deffinition ! ) don't repeat the old lies, insults, propaganda of the 50s, anymore.

Thus far, two columns, at least two major distortions, a host of lies and innuendos, and a great deal of emotional cavilings from old Dorothy. All in all, she's become totally unreliable for factual info and more of a Dowd than her canard about Ann !

Thanks for the link ! :-)

Two Rabinowitz's were called to testify before McCarthy. Victor was an unapologetic leftist all his life. Haven't checked out Seymon yet. Wonder if she is related to either of them. Or perhaps this explains it:Treason, page 101:

The image of McCarthy riding roughshod over civil liberties and terrifying small children is difficult to square with the fact that the public loved him . . .The more he rallied against Communists working for the government, the higher his approval ratings soared.
At the height of the left's counterattack against McCarthy, just months away from a Senate censure, Americans told pollsters they approved of the job he was going by 50 to 29 percent . . .his approval rating was 63 percent. Gallup polls from 1950 to 1954 ...showed that Catholics supported McCarthy by 56 to 29 percent; Protestants supported him by 45 to 36 percent . . . Jews opposed McCarthy by 82 to 3 percent.