[Dave S]

Are you saying that anyone who chooses to defend Ann Coulter, who provides extensive footnotes to all her statements of fact, somehow loses the right to point out dishonesty in others? Care to back that up with something other than an ad hominem?

I think you understood me, although I dont think you lose the right to point out dishonesty in others. I just wish you would not be so quick to accuse others of it when Ann would lie through her teeth to make a point if she could. See takes an extreme position for shock value. She should have have been a schock jock.

Do I care to take ten hours of my time trying to prove it to you or anyone else who worships at Ann's croch, no. It would be a waste of my time. Anyone who purrs over every word from Ann is not open to discussion, just attack.

[visitor]

it does not matter to me whether you like Ann or not, but it does matter to me when you refer to those who do as ...anyone else who worships at Ann's croch, such language is not appreciated or appropriate in this open forum ...rto

[Bernard Marx]

Ann would lie through her teeth to make a point if she could

Crucial point: does she? If you think so, prove it.