Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

God...not G-d

Posted on 07/07/2003 3:50:21 AM PDT by grumple

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-231 next last
To: HairOfTheDog
I didn't even use any bad words...
201 posted on 07/07/2003 5:30:35 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
I just keep ROFL..... It brought back memories from the old SNL days "Jane, you ignorant slut!"
202 posted on 07/07/2003 5:33:53 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Not all those who wander are lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

Comment #203 Removed by Moderator

To: talleyman
It had a legitimate start among Orthodox Jewish scholars discussing pre-Roman Palestine.... but it caught on among the wrong crowd.
204 posted on 07/07/2003 6:17:32 PM PDT by Ronly Bonly Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: grumple; ntnychik
but when you start sending messages regarding the Lord, people think twice about sharing.

I received this in an email quite some time ago and sent it to all my friends and relatives. It's a good article.

I am a Catholic and have NEVER before heard that not fully spelling God showed respect!!

On the contrary - I would think that each time we say or spell Gods name with respect and love - it gives Him pleasure!!

205 posted on 07/07/2003 6:23:30 PM PDT by potlatch (Mark Twain; Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
I'm aware of all of that

From your posts, I would argue that you were not. Apparently, you did not even know that there is no Hebrew letter "J".
206 posted on 07/07/2003 7:01:05 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Dave Elias
Yud-Hey-Waw-Hey

I know that some "Sacred Name" people have argued thus, as well as many seminarians who have had to learn German before Hebrew, but I would simply point out that it is more likely German and Yiddish influences that gave us "Waw". Regardless, the pronunciation may in fact be as academic as how early English was pronounced... for instance, all our "J"s - can you prove they sounded like "JAY" as opposed to "IAY"?

My points were not so much about pronunciation, but about the letters themselves.
207 posted on 07/07/2003 7:09:54 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
My opinion is that such a debate falls under the squabbling that we were cautioned about

Possibly. But mocking others for such a conviction is uncalled for. What is sad about some posts on this thread is that they claim that they want to take a "libertarian" tack on it (e.g. "Let me do it my way") and then mock others for doing something. That is neither "libertarian" nor conservative... it is just poor manners.
208 posted on 07/07/2003 7:12:11 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Do you disagree that the proper name for the Judeo-Christian deity is in fact "JHVH/IHVH/Jehova"?

Not only would conservative Jews disagree with you, but informed "Christians" as well. But since you already said you "know all about that", I suppose it is redundant for me to tell you that there IS NO SUCH NAME as "Jehovah" in Scripture (only a TRANSLATION error put in into the King James Version). There is NO SUCH LETTER in Hebrew "J". So the answer to your taunt is: NO, the God of the Hebrew and "Christian" Scriptures is NOT named "JHVH/IHVH/Jehova". There are literally dozens of Names for the Holy One of Israel, but you haven't even gotten close once in this entire thread. Those who can read Hebrew must be smirking at your vague rudeness.
209 posted on 07/07/2003 7:20:14 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
G-d allows the ineffable name to be erased for the sake of bringing peace between a husband and wife.

Thanks for your thoughtful post. This line caught my eye and tells so much about what people do not know about Judaism or the "Old Testament"- because it is the essence of grace, mercy, and justice. 1,700 years of twisting about what Jews of the "Old Testament" believed has created an impression that there is no "grace" in the "Law". How sad that the word "Torah" (literally "Instruction") has come to mean some cold hard granite to so many people.

Blessings upon you.

The steps of a good man are ordered by the Lord, and He delights in his way. Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down; for the Lord upholds him with His hand. I have been young, and now am old; yet I have not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his descendants begging bread. He is ever merciful, and lends; and his descendants are blessed. Depart from evil, and do good; and dwell forevermore. For the Lord loves justice, and does not forsake His saints; they are preserved forever, but the descendants of the wicked shall be cut off. The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell in it forever. The mouth of the righteous speaks wisdom, and his tongue talks of justice. The Law [Torah] of his God is in his heart; none of his steps shall slide." Psalm 37:23-31
210 posted on 07/07/2003 7:30:23 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I use traditional symbols in the same way you do and find them as satisfying in relating to other folks. I'm just the type of person that has to reevaluate a tradition that from time to time gets my attention. Every time I see "G-d" it makes me want to think a phrase I avoid in favor of a tradition I do hold with, the commandments. There, God doesn't seem to leave any guesswork.

Yes, if Go- or -Od were used, I'd not care one way or the other.

I've used the apple a couple years now, for identification, so I guess you could say it's a tradition since putting it there is just reflex now.

211 posted on 07/07/2003 7:30:47 PM PDT by William Terrell (People can exist without government but government can't exist without people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
When I am in an environment where brothers spell God as "G-d" I will do so in order to honor their reverence of God. Jewish World Review is such an environment. When I am in an environment where GOD is used as spelled, I do so. Perhaps it is legalism to use G-d. It really doesn't matter. My liberty in God permits me to do either. My respect for the spiritual needs for brothers and sisters demands I recognize their need to respect Him as they feel led.

At last. Through all the coarseness and silliness, true wisdom! Well stated.
212 posted on 07/07/2003 7:38:21 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: grumple
While I am not sure, I think the Jews spell it G-D because they do not speak the sacred name. Others who spell it that way will have to explain themselves for themselves.
213 posted on 07/07/2003 7:56:33 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holden
I don't mean to imply anything. My interest in the use of the abbreviation is because it jolts me when I come across it, much like the C.E. and B.C.E., capturing my attention and bringing up all these questions. From time to time I go hunting answers.

Would you say then that the English 'g' 'o' 'd' started missing the 'o' when Jewish families started migrating to America and England before that?

How would the name "God" be writen in Hebrew, or Greek, or Aramaic? And how would one modify it in any of those languages to truncate it's full form? Has that been done in the past for those languages?

Another fellow on this thread can point to a rabbinical law the implys the practice, but no indication it was followed, as many of such laws from the same source are not followed, there are so many of them, and he didn't post any examples where the name of God had been abbreviated in those other languages. But he didn't want to discuss it further.

Can you refer me to something that explains the spelling difference in those languages and their usage?

214 posted on 07/07/2003 7:59:41 PM PDT by William Terrell (People can exist without government but government can't exist without people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
Well, you are not wrong, the same also being true of latin. However, my fundemental point is that the name of God as written in antiquity is of uncertain pronounciation, although its pictographical representation (we disagree only as to the english alphabet interpretation me Waw, you Vav) an arm, a dude with his hands in the air, a hook peg thing, and another dude with his hands in the air is written in its entirety. Because of the unique nature of the letters that make up YHWH (or YHVH if you prefer)it could be pronounced in a number of ways.

I maintain the correct pronounciation was widely known once (people were illiterate and would not have relied upon text for correct diction), but over the years this knowledge has been lost since it is not clear from the word. This ambiguity has been interpreted as deliberate in order to prevent people from speaking such a holy word.

However regardless of the derivation of the tradition it now clearly is an expression of faith to regard the word itself as holy. Fair enough. What is fascinating is how the practise of ommiting the 'o' in God basically turns the ritual on its head. That is in Hebrew the word can be written, but cannot be correctly spoken, whereas in English this is transposed to become a word that may be spoken but not written.
215 posted on 07/07/2003 8:00:32 PM PDT by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Dave Elias
Well, you are not wrong, the same also being true of latin. However, my fundemental point is that the name of God as written in antiquity is of uncertain pronounciation, although its pictographical representation (we disagree only as to the english alphabet interpretation me Waw, you Vav)

Well I suppose I may indeed be wrong about much, but what from my post is wrong, and how you declare it to be such with such conviction I am not sure, considering that it was precisely the point I was making.

Because of the unique nature of the letters that make up YHWH (or YHVH if you prefer)it could be pronounced in a number of ways.

I was not arguing that is should not be pronounced, but that it is not clear how one should pronounce it since the vowel pointings were not represented (and if they were, then the sheva and patach CERTAINLY do NOT result in slang American "YAHWAY". There are many theories, but all just that - theories.

a hook peg thing

I suppose some of the "waw" stuff also comes from confusion over how a consonant can sound like an "ooh" and in some phonetic soundings, a "waw" can be made to sound like an "ooh" better than a "vav". But then again, the "ooh" sound is not just a "vav" issue - other letters make it too! Maybe we can get some German speakers here to tell us who we can make those sounds as well < g >

I maintain the correct pronounciation was widely known once (people were illiterate and would not have relied upon text for correct diction)

No, rather their literacy was quite high. They were people of the Book. Reading was not only a right - it was a responsibility. They did, as you point out, know quite well how the Name was pronounced, since even if they substituted "Adonai" or "HaShem" as some do today, they in fact heard the High Priest say the Name each Yom Kippur as the Mishna records.

What is fascinating is how the practise of ommiting the 'o' in God basically turns the ritual on its head

Only in the minds of those who have other rituals. That, is the nature of ritual, isn't it?
216 posted on 07/07/2003 8:38:20 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
I respectfully draw your attention to the fourth word of the first line of my last post.

I wish to have a scholarly discourse with you, not to get into an arguement.
217 posted on 07/07/2003 10:42:25 PM PDT by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
Possibly. But mocking others for such a conviction is uncalled for.

I never indicated that it was a one-sided thing.

218 posted on 07/08/2003 5:05:08 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (For or against us.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
From your posts, I would argue that you were not. Apparently, you did not even know that there is no Hebrew letter "J".

Obviously, you need to take a reading comprehension course. My post explicitly spells out the three most common permutations. Including the IHVH version. I am also fully aware of the Yod/Yow/Yah-Hay/Haw-Vah/Vaw/Vow-Hay/Haw varients in dilect and time period.

Which completely dodges the point I was trying to make that such a designator, even an incorrect one such as Yoweh, is MUCH closer to truth and reality than the generic deification moniker "God".

Don't be an imbecile. I wasn't trying to make any other point.

219 posted on 07/08/2003 5:26:20 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Dave Elias
Forgive me. You are of course quite gracious. When I read your response I found it thoughtful and gracious - my inattention to the first line is what caused my confusion. So sorry.
220 posted on 07/08/2003 6:36:39 AM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson