To: justshutupandtakeit
What does McCarthy's alleged actions on behalf of SS men have to do with the book? Coulter wants the reader to think better of McCarthy, the man and politician.
Defending the SS in a specific case when they have killed Americans is indefensible, which is precisely why Coulter left it out of her book.
96 posted on
07/06/2003 10:41:10 PM PDT by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
There was no reason such unproven allegations would be in a serious book about another subject entirely. I would be surprised if there is anything in those allegations.
104 posted on
07/06/2003 10:50:34 PM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: sinkspur
Dorothy's article questioning why Ann Coulter didn't include a certain decision or stand that McCarthy made during his career is a huge injustice to Ann's book. McCarthy's demonization by the left is what she writes about, NOT on why McCarthy should be considered for Saint hood.
It would be like ignoring everything Dick Morris has to say because he didn't detail in his book about the mistakes Janet Reno made, when the point of his book was to expose how Bill Clinton neglected his duties as POTUS
122 posted on
07/06/2003 11:00:22 PM PDT by
MJY1288
(He Who Believes Freedom Isn't For All, Is Working For The Devil)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson