Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pokey78
No one can accuse the Wall Street Editorial page of being a den of left-wingers. Nor would a leftwinger derisively compare Coulter (whom they hate) to Dowd (whom they love). It's time Coulter lovers realize that not everyone who doesn't buy her rhetoric is a liberal.

The Nazi omission is as serious as omission as you can get. Saying "Oh, but she didn't have time to put that in" is like saying, "Oh, Hillary didn't have time to put in all those rape and abuse allegations in her book."
40 posted on 07/06/2003 9:54:27 PM PDT by MaxPlus305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MaxPlus305
The Nazi omission is as serious as omission as you can get. Saying "Oh, but she didn't have time to put that in" is like saying, "Oh, Hillary didn't have time to put in all those rape and abuse allegations in her book."

Including it would have negated all the hosannas she heaps on McCarthy.

Defending Nazis is still an abomination, though I'm sure some Coulter fans will twist themselves into pretzels coming up with a rationale for the "oversight."

47 posted on 07/06/2003 10:04:50 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: MaxPlus305
Frankly, I don't care if Rabinowitz is liberal or conservative. I do care that she fails to address the fact that Coulter's book is backed up with facts. If Rabinowitz ignores that, I can't take her critique of the book seriously.
214 posted on 07/07/2003 5:56:59 AM PDT by alnick (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson