To: habs4ever
Well, she's way off the mark on this one.
To: nopardons
I agree. She's off the mark on this one. I've read TREASON twice. I'm not sure she finished the first half of the book, before she wrote her article.
41 posted on
07/06/2003 9:55:32 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(Prayers for all)
To: nopardons
Ann is what she is..and she has galvanized this issue through the strength, or notoriety, of her personality, which serves both her interests and those of history, though I'm not convinced her work serves the latter ;-)
A dull prof bringing more Venona et al to light lacks the splash this Pubby blonde(?) warrior brings, which is both good and bad, but consider her a pop phenomenon.I'd take her over Andrew Sullivan, but she is still a one trick pony...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson