[Jhoffa_]

One has to define theft before one can apply it.

ROFL..

You're going to work that into your closing arguments I assume?

Good luck selling the judge and jury on that concept, Mr. Hajman.

[Hajman]

ROFL..

You're going to work that into your closing arguments I assume?

Good luck selling the judge and jury on that concept, Mr. Hajman.

It's not a concept. It's part and parcel of a logical argument. If you don't define your terms first, then apply them, you're argument is logically invalid. Copying the boat and copying the song are topologically the same thing (just different materials being used). If one is not theft, the other is also not theft (if your argument is consistent). Also, by the same argument, if making the boat copy for someone else isn't theft, then making the song copy for someone else isn't theft. Can you come up with a logical counterpoint to my argument, or not?

-The Hajman-