[longtermmemmory]

So what is the solution. Requiring reporters to state they are straight or homosexual? NYT is dominated by homosexuals but they are not loosing money even with the blair scandal.

Even hollywood gets coy with who is in or who is out. They use the tag line "this is nothing wrong with being "gay"." There is everything wrong with being homosexual.
(s)
Perhaps in the name of diversity they should start to collect data on sexual preference. This way employers could list the orientation they are hireing. Sorry we are looking for more straight people/homosexual people. Can you imagine college admissions? "What do you mean you checked the homosexual box!"
(/s)

Before lawrence there were coments by homosexuals that this was not about marriage. After lawrence, the tv news stories were all showing homosexual "marrigae" ceremonies.

[mrustow]

Before lawrence there were coments by homosexuals that this was not about marriage. After lawrence, the tv news stories were all showing homosexual "marrigae" ceremonies.

That's when I started understanding Rick Santorum. Lawrence was a classic case of stealth politics. But what the public didn't know, was that the activists had USSC justices in their pockets.

[CyberAnt]

"not losing money"

Hmmmm? They have lost a 5% share of the market in newspaper sales - I'd say that's a GREAT LOSS OF MONEY!!