Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mac_truck; GOPcapitalist; stainlessbanner; 4ConservativeJustices
Whether slavery shall go into Nebraska, or other new territories, is not a matter of exclusive concern to the people who may go there. The whole nation is interested that the best use shall be made of these territories. We want them for the homes of free white people. This they cannot be, to any considerable extent, if slavery shall be planted within them. Slave States are places for poor white people to remove FROM; not to remove TO. New free States are the places for poor people to go to and better their condition. For this use, the nation needs these territories.--abraham lincoln Oct 16,1854

1857-- Democrats lowered tariffs further. An economic panic hit soon thereafter, precipitating a fall-off in imports in the wake of the recession that followed. Government revenues plummeted by 30%. In response, the nascent Republican Party called for higher tariffs.

In order for the bond program to be successful, the North needed an unrestricted currency supply for citizens to pay for them and a source of income to guarantee the interest. The Legal Tender Act filled the first requirement. Passed in February, 1862, the Act authorized the issue of $150 million in Treasury notes, known as Greenbacks.

Tax History Museum

The Civil War was expected to be short and relatively low cost. Treasury Secretary Salmon Chase initially financed the war effort by borrowing. As Northern losses mounted, it became obvious that the war would be long, bloody, and expensive. The Revenue Act of 1862 increase taxes dramatically, including the first federal income tax, the creation of the Office of Internal Revenue, and the first federal use of adhesive revenue stamps. The total cost of the war to the federal government was $3 billion, about a quarter of it financed through taxes, customs duties, and other federal revenues

Financing the Civil War

Yeah happy birthday, first deficit this large in the nation's history, fiat money, the first income tax, and internal improvements that brought forth a bankrupt railroad. The Republican Party of the 1800s was not the conservative party of the time

13 posted on 07/06/2003 3:36:19 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
The Republican Party of the 1800s was not the conservative party of the time

BUMP. Worth repeating.

35 posted on 07/07/2003 3:05:46 PM PDT by 4CJ ("No man's life, liberty or property are safe while dims and neocons are in control")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: billbears
And to celebrate, they are going to burn Atlanta once again.
37 posted on 07/08/2003 9:17:11 PM PDT by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson