To: MeeknMing
The NY Times is basically a homosexual paper, so it wasn't too surprising when they changed their policy. What I wonder is what it will do to revenue streams if they keep it up. Announcing your daughter's marriage is a joyous and sacred occasion for most people. Will the parents of the bride want to pay good money to make these announcements if the adjoining column announces the marriage of Bruce and Bruce complete with a picture like the one above?
Would you want your children's weddings to be announced via posters on the local whorehouse?
8 posted on
07/06/2003 7:07:03 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
Will the parents of the bride want to pay good money to make these announcements if the adjoining column announces the marriage of Bruce and Bruce complete with a picture like the one above?Not likely, I ain't gonna do it. And also, considering that the 2 "gays" aren't having a legit marriage anyway, unless they go to Vermont or Hawaii.
I think newpapers are already fighting circulation and cost problems, it's easy to imagine this trend not helping much.
11 posted on
07/06/2003 7:18:52 AM PDT by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: Cicero
"Will the parents of the bride want to pay good money to make these announcements if the adjoining column announces the marriage of Bruce and Bruce complete with a picture like the one above? " I certainly wouldn't.
13 posted on
07/06/2003 7:23:00 AM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson