Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
The NY Times is basically a homosexual paper, so it wasn't too surprising when they changed their policy. What I wonder is what it will do to revenue streams if they keep it up. Announcing your daughter's marriage is a joyous and sacred occasion for most people. Will the parents of the bride want to pay good money to make these announcements if the adjoining column announces the marriage of Bruce and Bruce complete with a picture like the one above?

Would you want your children's weddings to be announced via posters on the local whorehouse?
8 posted on 07/06/2003 7:07:03 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
Will the parents of the bride want to pay good money to make these announcements if the adjoining column announces the marriage of Bruce and Bruce complete with a picture like the one above?

Not likely, I ain't gonna do it. And also, considering that the 2 "gays" aren't having a legit marriage anyway, unless they go to Vermont or Hawaii.

I think newpapers are already fighting circulation and cost problems, it's easy to imagine this trend not helping much.

11 posted on 07/06/2003 7:18:52 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
"Will the parents of the bride want to pay good money to make these announcements if the adjoining column announces the marriage of Bruce and Bruce complete with a picture like the one above? "

I certainly wouldn't.

13 posted on 07/06/2003 7:23:00 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson