Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato
"... sophistry."

Which the state and federal courts, and particularly the Supreme Court, have proven themselves quite good at, don't you think?

Yes sir, I do.

A Supreme Court that rules a State may violate the 14th Amendment, for the benefits of diversity, is a scofflaw court.

The USSC gave the Second Amendment the same contemptuous treatment in Cruikshank.

"The Second Amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress." -- US Supreme Court, U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875), Presser v. State of Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886)

48 posted on 07/07/2003 9:59:16 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H; Admin Moderator
Thank you Moderator.

(just so no one wonders-- I requested my #47 be removed due to typo which was corrected in #48)

49 posted on 07/07/2003 10:07:03 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson