Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thinktwice; Hank Kerchief; unspun; Alamo-Girl
I am not "Christian baiting." I am using reason to defend reason.

Dear thinktwice, if you sincerely believe that this is what you're doing, then I suggest you reflect on the excerpt from Prof. Lewontin. Try to see how it is he who is making an attack on reason, not Christians. In the interest of defending materialist science, he rules reason entirely out of the question: He point-blank states he is prepared to accept "the patent absurdity of some of [scientific materialism's] constructs," just so long as he can keep preserve his doctrine intact.

If you cannot grasp how irrational, anti-rational such a position is, then I wonder about the state of your own "reasonableness," or rationality.

Meanwhile, I repeat: Kindly desist from Christian baiting/bashing. Don't deny you do this: You do it here on my thread, and anywhere else you go at FR, and it is simply disingenuous of you to deny what is patently obvious to just about everyone else.

678 posted on 07/15/2003 10:13:15 AM PDT by betty boop (We can have either human dignity or unfettered liberty, but not both. -- Dean Clancy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
Thank you so much for the heads ups to your great posts! The comments by boris are excellent!

With regard to the other subject, I wish to observe that most atheists merely do not believe in God whereas the spirit of anti-Christ believes and hates God. Devils on the other hand, believe and tremble.

Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. - James 2:19

OTOH, if the one who is anti-Christ declares that he is an atheist - then he is hating a Personality which he alleges does not exist.

And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; - Romans 1:28

Food for thought...

682 posted on 07/15/2003 10:55:05 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop
You write ... ... He point-blank states he is prepared to accept "the patent absurdity of some of [scientific materialism's] constructs," just so long as he can keep preserve his doctrine intact.

If you cannot grasp how irrational, anti-rational such a position is, then I wonder about the state of your own "reasonableness," or rationality.

What Prof. Lewontin is saying is that the use of reason is acceptable up to the point where reason conflicts with doctrine; and you're sayiing that Prof. Lewontin's position is irrational and anti-rational.

I agree with your assessment as to Prof. Lewontin's irrationality; but you don't seem to be connecting the dots showing positive correlation between Prof. Lewontin's position and theological positions; correlations that tell me their positions are one and the same when it comes to intentionally avoiding reason whenever reason conflicts with doctrine.

683 posted on 07/15/2003 11:03:23 AM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson