Hi there. If in any way you're referring to me, I'm not sure what to apologize for, but if there is something, you have it. I tend to be willing address in a higher degree of scrutiny with skepticism, the behavior and persona of those who would be offensive toward God and those who believe Him at his Word, i.e., intentional blasphemers. I am certainly willing to be offensive toward you, some definitions of the word. (But I don't hold anything against you.)
Now, who does pay you to write, if you are a person who writes and are paid for it?
bb, Capt. Kierkegaard was known for beating on people, around the bush, while trying not to explain himself, wasn't he? Maybe that is where this poster has picked up the tactics.
In sales tactics, they call that "spreading FUD" --i.e., fear, uncertainty and doubt. It seems that the HK and TMS' effictive FR missions have been to separate Christians from their Savior --and prevent unbelievers from believing --under the banner of autonomist-ness (spiritual autism would be a better use of the prefix).
A fair characterization, Hank Kerchief?
BTW, it's up to you to explain consicousness --I'm sure it would be very good to read, but I've asked the same question of Hank Kerchief. If he wants to discuss, shouldn't he do the same, instead of waiting for you to post, so if past performance is indicative of future result, he can attempt to obfuscate, invert, and pervert?
Be assured, I never refer to you.
Hank