Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
The "observer problem" is easy enough to explain in the case of the macroworld.

Frankly, I don't see the observer as necessarily affecting the observed here in the macro world either -- only in the philosophical realm of changing knowing everything about the observed.

I gather most physicists are just so happy that it "works" that they don't care about why it works. It's a kind of "don't ask, don't tell" kinda thing.... :^)

BTW, I like RightWhale's answer to my question. It makes simple sense to my particularly simple mind. But where there are aberrations in the behavior of quanta, relative to big stuff, don't tell the Supreme Court about it, they'll find a compelling interest in it, under the penumbra of where the sun don't shine.

266 posted on 07/08/2003 1:18:01 PM PDT by unspun ("Do everything in love." - No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
Oops. I named you above, and didn't ping.
267 posted on 07/08/2003 1:18:35 PM PDT by unspun ("Do everything in love." - No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson