Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop
There has been a strong tendency for biology to look away from the question of what is the difference between life and non-life.

That is certainly part of the reason why I find Grandpierre's thesis so refreshing. Certainly just about all of us know that there is a difference between life and non-life. However, Grandpierre brings that difference to life. Life certainly works against the laws of non-life - it makes liquids defy gravity, it mixes simple chemical compounds in fantastic ways which the physical laws are totally unable to accomplish. It also changes and transforms the physical universe in which it inhabits - to fit its purposes. And this last is the most important difference in my view between life and non-life, it has purpose, it has a goal something which cannot be said of non-living matter. It is therefore something totally different which adds a new dimension to the Universe.

208 posted on 07/07/2003 7:49:59 PM PDT by gore3000 (Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
So true, so true. Thank you for your post!

BTW, if you haven't read the Pattee article yet, it's more on the same subject and gives some historical context:

The Physics of Symbols: Bridging the Epistemic Cut


211 posted on 07/07/2003 7:57:25 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson