To: unspun; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; Phaedrus; logos; beckett; cornelis; Diamond
You need reality, however it is not demonstrable that reality will eventually have any need of you. Any concept of reality that excludes me, or you, or any other fact is not reality. So, reality does need us, to be conceptually correct. Reality is not a thing, it is a concept for all that exists as it exists.
Hank
To: Hank Kerchief
it is a concept Ancient philosophy recognized that reality exceeded the human capability of comprehensive conceptualization. Thus, a true concept of reality began to involve negative predication as well as predication of transcendence. This has similarities to modern rationalism as, for example, in Kant.
To: Hank Kerchief; cornelis
When you die, but for this event, all of reality will remain basically the same, for the rest of us and for all that is inanimate, I'm pretty sure.
108 posted on
07/06/2003 4:31:25 PM PDT by
unspun
("Do everything in love." - No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
To: Hank Kerchief; Anybody; Sensible
Reality is not a thing, it is a concept for all that exists as it exists. When you trip and hit your face on the pavement, is the pavement real, or is that just your concept?
If you prefer, use "reals" instead of reality, i.e., all that is, really and truly... whether or not you know it.
110 posted on
07/06/2003 4:41:54 PM PDT by
unspun
("Do everything in love." - No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson