[vaudine]

Thanks for the post. This is such a vast subject, that I do not believe either side will convince the other. Some of these posters like to split hairs over what is science and what is not. And if they are into denying ID or Creationism, there is no limit to the ends they will go to discredit them. Fortunately, there are some great scientists who are gradually refuting Darwin and other scientific "givens" of the last hundred years, using 20th century findings to do so. It is driving the Evolutionists wild.

vaudine

[RadioAstronomer]

Fortunately, there are some great scientists who are gradually refuting Darwin and other scientific "givens" of the last hundred years, using 20th century findings to do so. It is driving the Evolutionists wild.

Cite sources.

[RightWingNilla]

This is such a vast subject, that I do not believe either side will convince the other.

How would you present the theory of Intelligent Design to high school biology students? What exactly should be put in the textbooks?

[gore3000]

Fortunately, there are some great scientists who are gradually refuting Darwin and other scientific "givens" of the last hundred years, using 20th century findings to do so. It is driving the Evolutionists wild.

Evolution has already been refuted, numerous times as I showed in post#66. The evos cannot even give a statement as to what their theory is because every single part of it has been refuted. Some scientific theory!

The irony of the situation is that it was the evos who claimed that once science progressed the idea of God as the Creator would dissappear. Instead, the more science has learned, the more obvious it is that life, the Universe, and all things were created by God.