Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike4Freedom
For you to believe that Iraq was no danger, you would have to believe that they had no WMD.

If Iraq had no WMD, Clinton lied repeatedly.
If Iraq had no WMD, the UN lied and falsified numerous international reports.
If Iraq had no WMD, then those thousands of Iraqis and Iranians must have died by spontaneous human combustion.

The reasonable conclusion is that they indeed did have them- but they have either been transferred elsewhere or they are still hidden. Your post is foolish in that it ignores the plain truth that CLinton and UN have said FOR YEARS that Iraq possesses tons (literally) of WMD. Look at the UN report yourself.

I respect you for posting your view, but you failed to address even one of the obvious facts that entirely rebutt your assertion. How about addressing them? Then you could have a discussion.

96 posted on 07/05/2003 3:47:12 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
C'mon, don't you know? Dubya came up out of Texas in 2000 and had this bright idea and said "Hey everybody, Saddam's got WMD." Prior to this, nobody ever thought any such thing about Saddam.
100 posted on 07/05/2003 3:54:49 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson