Fascinating, however, I do not detect in this cite any point relevant to either question on the table. Where, in this cite, is it demonstrated that, because some marxists and fascists believe in darwinian theory, or find darwinian theory "handy". That that somehow therefore scientifically invalidates Darwinism? It plainly does not. The social consequences of adopting a theory are not a logically relevant measure of it's truth or falsehood.
Assuming you were addressing the other conversation: where, in this cite, is it demonstrated that Darwin was a plagarist? Again, I see no nothing remotely relevant to the point in at hand.
Oh, and just to keep the table up to date--what was the (tag) to which you previously referred. Is this it? If so, how is this cite relevant to your suggestion that I am lying (which I am not, merely speculating) as to why you provoke some threads out of existence and leave others stand?
Oh, and while you are at it--could you supply that cite you accidently overlooked supplying in the previous discussion as to where I offered some sort of rude epithet toward the bible? I take that one sort of personally, and would very much like you to cite a demonstration that you are not simply making it up.